Literature DB >> 23149530

Low primary cesarean rate and high VBAC rate with good outcomes in an Amish birthing center.

James Deline1, Lisa Varnes-Epstein, Lee T Dresang, Mark Gideonsen, Laura Lynch, John J Frey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent national guidelines encourage a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) as a means of increasing vaginal births after cesarean (VBACs) and decreasing the high US cesarean birth rate and its consequences (2010 National Institute of Health Consensus Statement and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists revised guideline). A birthing center serving Amish women in Southwestern Wisconsin offered an opportunity to look at the effects of local culture and practices that support vaginal birth and TOLAC. This study describes childbirth and perinatal outcomes during a 17-year period in LaFarge, Wisconsin.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of the records of all women admitted to the birth center in labor. Main outcome measures include rates of cesarean deliveries, TOLAC and VBAC deliveries, and perinatal outcomes for 927 deliveries between 1993 and 2010.
RESULTS: The cesarean rate was 4% (35 of 927), the TOLAC rate was 100%, and the VBAC rate was 95% (88 of 92). There were no cases of uterine rupture and no maternal deaths. The neonatal death rate of 5.4 of 1,000 was comparable to that of Wisconsin (4.6 of 1,000) and the United States (4.5 of 1,000).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the culture of the population served and a number of factors relating to the management of labor at the birthing center have affected the rates of cesarean delivery and TOLAC. The results of the LaFarge Amish study support a low-technology approach to delivery where good outcomes are achieved with low cesarean and high VBAC rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23149530      PMCID: PMC3495927          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  24 in total

1.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Appropriate technology for birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

Authors:  E B Keeler; M Brodie
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Births: final data for 2007.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; T J Mathews; Sharon Kirmeyer; Michelle J K Osterman
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2010-08-09

6.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality.

Authors:  Karla N Solheim; Tania F Esakoff; Sarah E Little; Yvonne W Cheng; Teresa N Sparks; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-03-07

Review 8.  Continuous support for women during childbirth.

Authors:  Ellen D Hodnett; Simon Gates; G Justus Hofmeyr; Carol Sakala; Julie Weston
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-02-16

Review 9.  Dystocia in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Sara G Shields; Stephen D Ratcliffe; Patricia Fontaine; Larry Leeman
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.292

10.  A Native American community with a 7% cesarean delivery rate: does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate?

Authors:  Lawrence Leeman; Rebecca Leeman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  8 in total

1.  Modeling the intention to choose natural vaginal delivery: using reasoned action and social cognitive theories.

Authors:  Safieh Kanani; Hamid Allahverdipour; Mohammad AsghariJafarabadi
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2015-03-29

2.  Physical health conditions of the Amish and intervening social mechanisms: an exhaustive narrative review.

Authors:  Cory Anderson; Lindsey Potts
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Research Trends in Amish Population Health, a Growing Literature about a Growing Rural Population.

Authors:  Cory Anderson; Lindsey Potts
Journal:  J Rural Soc Sci       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  Outcomes for the First Year of Ontario's Birth Center Demonstration Project.

Authors:  Ann E Sprague; Dana Sidney; Elizabeth K Darling; Vicki Van Wagner; Bobbi Soderstrom; Judy Rogers; Erin Graves; Doug Coyle; Amanda Sumner; Vivian Holmberg; Bushra Khan; Mark C Walker
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.

Authors:  Bridget Basile Ibrahim; Holly Powell Kennedy; Margaret L Holland
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-11-17

6.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes in women planning vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) at home in England: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.

Authors:  R Rowe; Y Li; M Knight; P Brocklehurst; J Hollowell
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  The Integration of Ontario Birth Centers into Existing Maternal-Newborn Services: Health Care Provider Experiences.

Authors:  Jessica Reszel; Dana Sidney; Wendy E Peterson; Elizabeth K Darling; Vicki Van Wagner; Bobbi Soderstrom; Judy Rogers; Erin Graves; Bushra Khan; Ann E Sprague
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Breech birth at home: outcomes of 60 breech and 109 cephalic planned home and birth center births.

Authors:  Stuart James Fischbein; Rixa Freeze
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.