Literature DB >> 19148747

The effect of physicians' remuneration system on the Caesarean section rate: the Uruguayan case.

Patricia Triunfo1, Máximo Rossi.   

Abstract

Using data about births from the perinatal information system (PIS) registered in Montevideo (Uruguay), we estimated the probability of having a Caesarian section delivery, controlled by risk factors and the endogeneity of the choice of hospital. In public hospitals in Montevideo there is a fixed payment system, but in private hospitals this procedure has to be paid for separately. In the former, there is no effect on the doctor's income if he performs a Caesarian, but in the latter there is a positive effect. Empirical evidence shows the probability of a Caesarean section increases with the age of the woman, the presence of eclampsy, pre-eclampsy, previous hypertension, previous Caesarean sections, multiple pregnancies and fetopelvic disproportion, and decreases for multiparous women and women in a public hospital. In fact, the probability of having a Caesarean section in a private institution is almost two times higher than in a public hospital (20% as against 39%). Focusing on women without risk factors, we found that the probability a Caesarian in a public hospital was 11%, but the probability in a private hospital was 25%. We conclude that the remuneration system explains an important part of this difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19148747     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-008-9054-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ        ISSN: 1389-6563


  4 in total

1.  Physician financial incentives and cesarean section delivery.

Authors:  J Gruber; M Owings
Journal:  Rand J Econ       Date:  1996

2.  How does the mode of delivery affect the cost of maternity care?

Authors:  L Clark; M Mugford; C Paterson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-06

3.  Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.

Authors:  E B Keeler; M Brodie
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery.

Authors:  J Jolly; J Walker; K Bhabra
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-03
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-03-22

2.  The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Lars Monkerud; Terje P Hagen; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild; Irene Skau
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Caesarean Section vs. Normal Vaginal Delivery: A Game Theory Discussion in Reimbursement Interventions.

Authors:  Marita Mohammadshahi; Hasan Hematyar; Masoumeh Najafi; Minoo Alipouri Sakha; Abolghasem Pourreza
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Public and social environment changes and caesarean section delivery choice in Japan.

Authors:  Michio Yuda
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-09-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.