Literature DB >> 9585744

Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China.

W W Cai1, J S Marks, C H Chen, Y X Zhuang, L Morris, J R Harris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the trend in cesarean section deliveries and the factors associated with it in the Minhang District of Shanghai, China.
METHODS: A representative sample of the members of 2716 households in the district were interviewed in the fall of 1993. This study analyzed the data from 1959 married women of reproductive age with at least one live birth.
RESULTS: During the past 3 decades, the proportion of infants born by cesarean section increased from 4.7% to 22.5%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the highest cesarean section rate, which occurred in the most recent period of 1988 through 1993, was associated with form of medical payment, self-reported complications during pregnancy, higher birthweight, and maternal age. Government insurance pays all costs of cesarean sections and accounted for the highest proportion of the cesarean section rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The high rates of cesarean sections in China are surprising given the lack of the factors that usually lead to cesarean sections. The increasing cesarean section rates may be an early indication that emerging forms of health insurance and fee-for-service payments to physicians will lead to an excessive emphasis on costly, high-technology medical care in China.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9585744      PMCID: PMC1508965          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.5.777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  The use of intradepartmental audit to contain cesarean section rate.

Authors:  S K Tay; F H Tsakok; C S Ng
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Determinants of caesarean section rates in Italy.

Authors:  F Parazzini; N Pirotta; C La Vecchia; L Fedele
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-03

3.  International differences in the use of obstetric interventions.

Authors:  F C Notzon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Cesarean section in America: dramatic trends, 1970 to 1987.

Authors:  S M Taffel
Journal:  Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co       Date:  1989 Oct-Dec

5.  Trends in cesarean section use in California, 1983 to 1990.

Authors:  R S Stafford; S D Sullivan; L B Gardner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Obstetric intervention and the economic imperative.

Authors:  J F King
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-04

7.  Caesarean on request.

Authors:  S K Lam
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil.

Authors:  F C Barros; J P Vaughan; C G Victora; S R Huttly
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.

Authors:  J B Gould; B Davey; R S Stafford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  29 in total

1.  Hospital competition under regulated prices: application to urban health sector reforms in China.

Authors:  Karen Eggleston; Winnie Yip
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-12

2.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008.

Authors:  Xing Lin Feng; Ling Xu; Yan Guo; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section.

Authors:  D Jacobs-Jokhan; G Hofmeyr
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

5.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

6.  Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China.

Authors:  Guo Sufang; Sabu S Padmadas; Zhao Fengmin; James J Brown; R William Stones
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Do Urgent Caesarean Sections Have a Circadian Rhythm?

Authors:  Serkan Doğru; Hatice Yılmaz Doğru; Tuğba Karaman; Aynur Şahin; Hakan Tapar; Serkan Karaman; Semih Arıcı; Asker Zeki Özsoy; Bülent Çakmak; Çiğdem Kunt İşgüder; İlhan Bahri Delibaş; Alkan Karakış
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-06-01

8.  Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Hüseyin Aksoy; Ülkü Aksoy; Burak Yücel; Sezin Saygı Özyurt; Gökhan Açmaz; Mustafa Alparslan Babayiğit; Günhan Gökahmetoğlu; Turgut Aydın
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-07-14

Review 9.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

10.  Study protocol. ECSSIT - Elective Caesarean Section Syntocinon Infusion Trial. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of oxytocin (Syntocinon) 5 IU bolus and placebo infusion versus oxytocin 5 IU bolus and 40 IU infusion for the control of blood loss at elective caesarean section.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Michael Carey; Alan A Montgomery; Sharon R Sheehan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.