Literature DB >> 8349735

Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism.

R V Skibbens1, V P Skeen, E D Salmon.   

Abstract

Most models of mitotic congression and segregation assume that only poleward pulling forces occur at kinetochores. However, there are reports for several different cell types that both mono-oriented and bi-oriented chromosomes oscillate toward and away from the pole throughout mitosis. We used new methods of high resolution video microscopy and computer-assisted tracking techniques to measure the positions over time of individual kinetochores with respect to their poles during mitosis in living newt lung cells. The results show that kinetochores oscillate throughout mitosis when they are tethered to spindle poles by attachment to the plus-ends of kinetochore microtubules (kMTs). Oscillations were not sinusoidal. Instead, kinetochores abruptly (as quick as 6 s or less) switched between persistent (approximately 1.5 min average duration) phases of poleward (P) and away from the pole (AP) movement. This kinetochore "directional instability" was a property of motility at the plus-ends of kMTs since fluorescent marks on the lattice of kMTs have previously been observed to exhibit only relatively slow P movement. Each P and AP phase consisted of one or a few constant velocity domains (approximately 1.7 microns/min average velocity). Velocities of P and AP phases were similar from prometaphase through mid-anaphase. Kinetochores occasionally switched to an indeterminant (N) phase of no or confused motion, which was usually brief compared to the durations of P and AP phases. Net chromosome displacements that occurred during congression to the equator or poleward movement during anaphase were primarily generated by differences in the durations and not the velocities of P and AP movements. Careful analysis of centromere deformation showed that kinetochore P movement produced pulling forces while kinetochore AP movement produced pushing forces. These data show that kinetochore directional instability is fundamental to the processes of chromosome congression and segregation. We argue that tension at the kinetochore attachment site is a key factor which controls the switching between P and AP phases of kinetochore motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8349735      PMCID: PMC2119582          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.122.4.859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  62 in total

1.  Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. III. Patterns of chromosome behavior during prometaphase.

Authors:  U P Roos
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-03-10       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  A cinematographic study of meiosis in salamander spermatocytes in vitro.

Authors:  T Seto; J Kezer; C M Pomerat
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1969

Review 3.  Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filament assembly-disassembly.

Authors:  T L Hill; M W Kirschner
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1982

4.  Structure of kinetochore fibers: microtubule continuity and inter-microtubule bridges.

Authors:  P L Witt; H Ris; G G Borisy
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  The structure of the cold-stable kinetochore fiber in metaphase PtK1 cells.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells.

Authors:  P A McNeill; M W Berns
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis.

Authors:  A S Bajer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase.

Authors:  D H Tippit; J D Pickett-Heaps; R Leslie
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length.

Authors:  T S Hays; D Wise; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement.

Authors:  S Inoué; H Sato
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  176 in total

1.  Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores.

Authors:  D B Hoffman; C G Pearson; T J Yen; B J Howell; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells.

Authors:  B F McEwen; G K Chan; B Zubrowski; M S Savoian; M T Sauer; T J Yen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Analysis of the distribution of the kinetochore protein Ndc10p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 3-D modeling of mitotic spindles.

Authors:  Thomas Müller-Reichert; Ingrid Sassoon; Eileen O'Toole; Maryse Romao; Anthony J Ashford; Anthony A Hyman; Claude Antony
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Chromosome congression is promoted by CENP-Q- and CENP-E-dependent pathways.

Authors:  James Bancroft; Philip Auckland; Catarina P Samora; Andrew D McAinsh
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments.

Authors:  Susan L Kline-Smith; Alexey Khodjakov; Polla Hergert; Claire E Walczak
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Authors:  Ajit P Joglekar; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Kerry S Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Kinetochore-microtubule interactions during cell division.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Claudio E Sunkel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  A functional relationship between NuMA and kid is involved in both spindle organization and chromosome alignment in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Aime A Levesque; Louisa Howard; Michael B Gordon; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Ted R Zarzar; E D Salmon; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.