Literature DB >> 7194343

Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells.

P A McNeill, M W Berns.   

Abstract

The role of the kinetochore in chromosome movement was studied by 532-nm wavelength laser microirradiation of mitotic PtK2 cells. When the kinetochore of a single chromatid is irradiated at mitotic prometaphase or metaphase, the whole chromosome moves towards the pole to which the unirradiated kinetochore is oriented, while the remaining chromosomes congregate on the metaphase plate. The chromatids of the irradiated chromosome remain attached to one another until anaphase, at which time they separate by a distance of 1 or 2 micrometers and remain parallel to each other, not undergoing any poleward separation. Electron microscopy shows that irradiated chromatids exhibit either no recognizable kinetochore structure or a typical inactive kinetochore in which the tri-layer structure is present but has no microtubules associated with it. Graphical analysis of the movement of the irradiated chromosome shows that the chromosome moves to the pole rapidly with a velocity of approximately 3 micrometers/min. If the chromosome is close to one pole at irradiation, and the kinetochore oriented towards that pole is irradiated, the chromosome moves across the spindle to the opposite pole. The chromosome is slowed down as it traverses the equatorial region, but the velocity in both half-spindles is approximately the same as the anaphase velocity of a single chromatid. Thus a single kinetochore moves twice the normal mass of chromatin (two chromatids) at the same velocity with which it moves a single chromatid, showing that the velocity with which a kinetochore moves is independent, within limits, of the mass associated with it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7194343      PMCID: PMC2112755          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.88.3.543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  19 in total

1.  CINE-MICROGRAPHIC STUDIES ON DICENTRIC CHROMOSOMES.

Authors:  A BAJER
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1964-12-10       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Cine-micrographic analysis of C-mitosis in endosperm.

Authors:  J MOLE-BAJER
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Irradiation of parts of individual cells. II. Effects of an ultraviolet microbeam focused on parts of chromosomes.

Authors:  R B URETZ; W BLOOM; R E ZIRKLE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1954-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Assembly of microtubules onto kinetochores of isolated mitotic chromosomes of HeLa cells.

Authors:  B R Telzer; M J Moses; J L Rosenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quantitative initiation of microtubule assembly by chromosomes from Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  R R Gould; G G Borisy
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Localization of ribonucleoprotein in the trilaminar kinetochore of PtK1.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1979-02

7.  Partial cell irradiation with a tunable organic dye laser.

Authors:  M W Berns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1972-12-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Mitosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Adv Cell Biol       Date:  1971

9.  Chromosome cycles turned on in unfertilized sea urchin eggs exposed to NH4OH.

Authors:  D Mazia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  In vitro polymerization of microtubules into asters and spindles in homogenates of surf clam eggs.

Authors:  R C Weisenberg; A C Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  41 in total

1.  Gene inactivation by multiphoton-targeted photochemistry.

Authors:  M W Berns; Z Wang; A Dunn; V Wallace; V Venugopalan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Evidence that replication fork components catalyze establishment of cohesion between sister chromatids.

Authors:  D R Carson; M F Christman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Principles of the highly ordered arrangement of metaphase I bivalents in spermatocytes of Agrodiaetus (Insecta, Lepidoptera).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Controlled ablation of microtubules using a picosecond laser.

Authors:  E L Botvinick; V Venugopalan; J V Shah; L H Liaw; M W Berns
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Nucleosome depletion alters the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres.

Authors:  M J Saunders; E Yeh; M Grunstein; K Bloom
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Mechanism and function of poleward flux in Xenopus extract meiotic spindles.

Authors:  T J Mitchison
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Laser microsurgery in the GFP era: a cell biologist's perspective.

Authors:  Valentin Magidson; Jadranka Loncarek; Polla Hergert; Conly L Rieder; Alexey Khodjakov
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.441

9.  Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Zhenye Yang; U Serdar Tulu; Patricia Wadsworth; Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Force and length in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Sophie Dumont; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.