Literature DB >> 7400213

Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase.

D H Tippit, J D Pickett-Heaps, R Leslie.   

Abstract

Prometaphase in two large species of diatoms is examined, using the following techniques: (a) time-lapse cinematography of chromosome movements in vivo; (b) electron microscopy of corresponding stages: (c) reconstruction of the microtubules (MTs) in the kinetochore fiber of chromosomes attached to the spindle. In vivo, the chromosomes independently commence oscillations back and forth to one pole. The kinetochore is usually at the leading edge of such chromosome movements; a variable time later both kinetochores undergo such oscillations but toward opposite poles and soon stretch poleward to establish stable bipolar attachment. Electron microscopy of early prometaphase shows that the kinetochores usually laterally associate with MTs that have one end attached to the spindle pole. At late prometaphase, most chromosomes are fully attached to the spindle, but the kinetochores on unattached chromosomes are bare of MTs. Reconstruction of the kinetochore fiber demonstrates that most of its MTs (96%) extend past the kinetochore and are thus apparently not nucleated there. At least one MT terminates at each kinetochore analyzed. Our interpretation is that the conventional view of kinetochore function cannot apply to diatoms. The kinetochore fiber in diatoms appears to be primarily composed of MTs from the poles, in contrast to the conventional view that many MTs of the kinetochore fiber are nucleated by the kinetochore. Similarly, chromosomes appear to initially orient their kinetochores to opposite poles by moving along MTs attached to the poles, instead of orientation effected by kinetochore MTs laterally associating with other MTs in the spindle. The function of the kinetochore in diatoms and other cell types is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7400213      PMCID: PMC2111477          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.86.2.402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  38 in total

Review 1.  Polarized intracellular particle transport: saltatory movements and cytoplasmic streaming.

Authors:  L I Rebhun
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1972

2.  [Electron microscopic studies on the form change of kinetochores during spermatocyte divisions in Pales ferruginea (Nematocera)].

Authors:  W Müller
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Chromosome micromanipulation. I. The mechanics of chromosome attachment to the spindle.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Staehly
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Co-orientation stability by physical tension: A demonstration with experimentally interlocked bivalents.

Authors:  S A Henderson; C A Koch
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Temperature-induced orientation instability during meiosis: an experimental analysis.

Authors:  S A Henderson; R B Nicklas; C A Koch
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Koch
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Notes on ultrastructure and some properties of transport within the living mitotic spindle.

Authors:  A Bajer
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Spindle shape changes as an indicator of force production in crane-fly spermatocytes.

Authors:  J R LaFountain
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement.

Authors:  S Inoué; H Sato
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Pac-Man does not resolve the enduring problem of anaphase chromosome movement.

Authors:  J D Pickett-Heaps; A Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Yeast weighs in on the elusive spindle matrix: New filaments in the nucleus.

Authors:  Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Zhenye Yang; U Serdar Tulu; Patricia Wadsworth; Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Mitosis: spindle evolution and the matrix model.

Authors:  Jeremy Pickett-Heaps; Art Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  What generates flux of tubulin in kinetochore microtubules?

Authors:  Arthur Forer; Jeremy D Pickett-Heaps; Tim Spurck
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 6.  Do nuclear envelope and intranuclear proteins reorganize during mitosis to form an elastic, hydrogel-like spindle matrix?

Authors:  Kristen M Johansen; Arthur Forer; Changfu Yao; Jack Girton; Jørgen Johansen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Centrosome-kinetochore interaction in multinucleate cells.

Authors:  S Ghosh; N Paweletz
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Kinetochore microtubules and chromosome movement during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes studied in life and with the electron microscope.

Authors:  K Church; H P Lin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  The three-dimensional architecture of chromosome fibres in the crane fly. II. Amphitelic sex univalents in meiotic anaphase I.

Authors:  H Fuge
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Cooperation of kinetochores and pole in the establishment of monopolar mitotic apparatus.

Authors:  D Mazia; N Paweletz; G Sluder; E M Finze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.