Literature DB >> 12080099

A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Ajit P Joglekar1, Alan J Hunt.   

Abstract

During mitosis, chromosomes become attached to microtubules that emanate from the two spindle poles. Thereafter, a chromosome moves along these microtubule "tracks" as it executes a series of movements that bring it to the spindle equator. After the onset of anaphase, the sister chromatids separate and move to opposite spindle poles. These movements are often characterized by "directional instability" (a series of runs with approximately constant speed, punctuated by sudden reversals in the direction of movement). To understand mitosis, it is critical to describe the physical mechanisms that underlie the coordination of the forces that drive directional instability. We propose a simple mechanistic model that describes the origin of the forces that move chromosomes and the coordination of these forces to produce directional instability. The model demonstrates that forces, speeds, and direction of motion associated with prometaphase through anaphase chromosome movements can be predicted from the molecular kinetics of interactions between dynamic microtubules and arrays of microtubule binding sites that are linked to the chromosome by compliant elements.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12080099      PMCID: PMC1302126          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75148-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  66 in total

Review 1.  "Dumb" versus "smart" kinetochore models for chromosome congression during mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; I S Gabashvili; C L Rieder
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  1999

2.  The dynamic behavior of individual microtubules associated with chromosomes in vitro.

Authors:  A J Hunt; J R McIntosh
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1988

4.  Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  T Mitchison; L Evans; E Schulze; M Kirschner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-05-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Theoretical problems related to the attachment of microtubules to kinetochores.

Authors:  T L Hill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The force-velocity relationship for microtubule sliding in demembranated sperm flagella of the sea urchin.

Authors:  K Oiwa; K Takahashi
Journal:  Cell Struct Funct       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.212

7.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth.

Authors:  T Mitchison; M Kirschner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Nov 15-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies.

Authors:  R A Walker; E T O'Brien; N K Pryer; M F Soboeiro; W A Voter; H P Erickson; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends.

Authors:  G J Gorbsky; P J Sammak; G G Borisy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle.

Authors:  C L Rieder; E A Davison; L C Jensen; L Cassimeris; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  M G Poirier; J F Marko
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Kerry S Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A force balance model of early spindle pole separation in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  E N Cytrynbaum; J M Scholey; A Mogilner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 5.  Tubulin depolymerization may be an ancient biological motor.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Vladimir Volkov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov; Ekaterina L Grishchuk
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Minimal model for collective kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Edward J Banigan; Kevin K Chiou; Edward R Ballister; Alyssa M Mayo; Michael A Lampson; Andrea J Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Force production by depolymerizing microtubules: a theoretical study.

Authors:  M I Molodtsov; E L Grishchuk; A K Efremov; J R McIntosh; F I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Microtubule movements on the arms of mitotic chromosomes: polar ejection forces quantified in vitro.

Authors:  Gary J Brouhard; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Simple models for extracting mechanical work from the ATP hydrolysis cycle.

Authors:  Jonathan L Eide; Arup K Chakraborty; George F Oster
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  The distribution of polar ejection forces determines the amplitude of chromosome directional instability.

Authors:  Kevin Ke; Jun Cheng; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.