Literature DB >> 14517328

Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

Chad G Pearson1, Paul S Maddox, Ted R Zarzar, E D Salmon, Kerry Bloom.   

Abstract

The interaction of kinetochores with dynamic microtubules during mitosis is essential for proper centromere motility, congression to the metaphase plate, and subsequent anaphase chromosome segregation. Budding yeast has been critical in the discovery of proteins necessary for this interaction. However, the molecular mechanism for microtubule-kinetochore interactions remains poorly understood. Using live cell imaging and mutations affecting microtubule binding proteins and kinetochore function, we identify a regulatory mechanism for spindle microtubule dynamics involving Stu2p and the core kinetochore component, Ndc10p. Depleting cells of the microtubule binding protein Stu2p reduces kinetochore microtubule dynamics. Centromeres remain under tension but lack motility. Thus, normal microtubule dynamics are not required to maintain tension at the centromere. Loss of the kinetochore (ndc10-1, ndc10-2, and ctf13-30) does not drastically affect spindle microtubule turnover, indicating that Stu2p, not the kinetochore, is the foremost governor of microtubule dynamics. Disruption of kinetochore function with ndc10-1 does not affect the decrease in microtubule turnover in stu2 mutants, suggesting that the kinetochore is not required for microtubule stabilization. Remarkably, a partial kinetochore defect (ndc10-2) suppresses the decreased spindle microtubule turnover in the absence of Stu2p. These results indicate that Stu2p and Ndc10p differentially function in controlling kinetochore microtubule dynamics necessary for centromere movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14517328      PMCID: PMC207010          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e03-03-0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  63 in total

1.  XMAP215 regulates microtubule dynamics through two distinct domains.

Authors:  A V Popov; A Pozniakovsky; I Arnal; C Antony; A J Ashford; K Kinoshita; R Tournebize; A A Hyman; E Karsenti
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast.

Authors:  G Goshima; M Yanagida
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation.

Authors:  T Tanaka; J Fuchs; J Loidl; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Mammalian mad2 and bub1/bubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints.

Authors:  D A Skoufias; P R Andreassen; F B Lacroix; L Wilson; R L Margolis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  P S Maddox; K S Bloom; E D Salmon
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  The N terminus of the centromere H3-like protein Cse4p performs an essential function distinct from that of the histone fold domain.

Authors:  Y Chen; R E Baker; K C Keith; K Harris; S Stoler; M Fitzgerald-Hayes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  The spindle cycle in budding yeast.

Authors:  M Winey; E T O'Toole
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast.

Authors:  X He; S Asthana; P K Sorger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-06-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis.

Authors:  C G Pearson; P S Maddox; E D Salmon; K Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03-19       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Stu2 promotes mitotic spindle elongation in anaphase.

Authors:  F Severin; B Habermann; T Huffaker; T Hyman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04-16       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  50 in total

1.  Laterally attached kinetochores recruit the checkpoint protein Bub1, but satisfy the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Michelle M Shimogawa; Megan M Wargacki; Eric G Muller; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Interdependency of fission yeast Alp14/TOG and coiled coil protein Alp7 in microtubule localization and bipolar spindle formation.

Authors:  Masamitsu Sato; Leah Vardy; Miguel Angel Garcia; Nirada Koonrugsa; Takashi Toda
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  The Caenorhabditis elegans kinetochore reorganizes at prometaphase and in response to checkpoint stimuli.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Stear; Mark B Roth
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  S. cerevisiae chromosomes biorient via gradual resolution of syntely between S phase and anaphase.

Authors:  Eugenio Marco; Jonas F Dorn; Pei-Hsin Hsu; Khuloud Jaqaman; Peter K Sorger; Gaudenz Danuser
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast.

Authors:  Melissa K Gardner; Chad G Pearson; Brian L Sprague; Ted R Zarzar; Kerry Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Measuring nanometer scale gradients in spindle microtubule dynamics using model convolution microscopy.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Melissa K Gardner; Leocadia V Paliulis; E D Salmon; David J Odde; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension.

Authors:  Carrie A Eckert; Daniel J Gravdahl; Paul C Megee
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Condensin function in mitotic nucleolar segregation is regulated by rDNA transcription.

Authors:  Bi-Dar Wang; Pavel Butylin; Alexander Strunnikov
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment.

Authors:  Jason Stumpff; George von Dassow; Michael Wagenbach; Charles Asbury; Linda Wordeman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 12.270

10.  Assembling the protein architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore-microtubule attachment using FRET.

Authors:  Pavithra Aravamudhan; Isabella Felzer-Kim; Kaushik Gurunathan; Ajit P Joglekar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.