Literature DB >> 11451998

Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores.

D B Hoffman1, C G Pearson, T J Yen, B J Howell, E D Salmon.   

Abstract

The ability of kinetochores to recruit microtubules, generate force, and activate the mitotic spindle checkpoint may all depend on microtubule- and/or tension-dependent changes in kinetochore assembly. With the use of quantitative digital imaging and immunofluorescence microscopy of PtK1 tissue cells, we find that the outer domain of the kinetochore, but not the CREST-stained inner core, exhibits three microtubule-dependent assembly states, not directly dependent on tension. First, prometaphase kinetochores with few or no kinetochore microtubules have abundant punctate or oblate fluorescence morphology when stained for outer domain motor proteins CENP-E and cytoplasmic dynein and checkpoint proteins BubR1 and Mad2. Second, microtubule depolymerization induces expansion of the kinetochore outer domain into crescent and ring morphologies around the centromere. This expansion may enhance recruitment of kinetochore microtubules, and occurs with more than a 20- to 100-fold increase in dynein and relatively little change in CENP-E, BubR1, and Mad2 in comparison to prometaphase kinetochores. Crescents disappear and dynein decreases substantially upon microtubule reassembly. Third, when kinetochores acquire their full metaphase complement of kinetochore microtubules, levels of CENP-E, dynein, and BubR1 decrease by three- to sixfold in comparison to unattached prometaphase kinetochores, but remain detectable. In contrast, Mad2 decreases by 100-fold and becomes undetectable, consistent with Mad2 being a key factor for the "wait-anaphase" signal produced by unattached kinetochores. Like previously found for Mad2, the average amounts of CENP-E, dynein, or BubR1 at metaphase kinetochores did not change with the loss of tension induced by taxol stabilization of microtubules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11451998      PMCID: PMC55648          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.12.7.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  53 in total

Review 1.  The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis.

Authors:  C L Rieder; E D Salmon
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 20.808

2.  The kinetochore microtubule minus-end disassembly associated with poleward flux produces a force that can do work.

Authors:  J C Waters; T J Mitchison; C L Rieder; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  How cells get the right chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage.

Authors:  S S Taylor; F McKeon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-30       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase.

Authors:  P Clute; J Pines
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; C L Rieder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push.

Authors:  J C Waters; R V Skibbens; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension.

Authors:  J C Waters; R H Chen; A W Murray; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p.

Authors:  K G Hardwick; R C Johnston; D L Smith; A W Murray
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-03-06       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase.

Authors:  G J Gorbsky; R H Chen; A W Murray
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  188 in total

1.  Microtubule flux mediates poleward motion of acentric chromosome fragments during meiosis in insect spermatocytes.

Authors:  J R LaFountain; R Oldenbourg; R W Cole; C L Rieder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  LIS1, CLIP-170's key to the dynein/dynactin pathway.

Authors:  Frédéric M Coquelle; Michal Caspi; Fabrice P Cordelières; Jim P Dompierre; Denis L Dujardin; Cynthia Koifman; Patrick Martin; Casper C Hoogenraad; Anna Akhmanova; Niels Galjart; Jan R De Mey; Orly Reiner
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  EB1 targets to kinetochores with attached, polymerizing microtubules.

Authors:  Jennifer S Tirnauer; Julie C Canman; E D Salmon; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension.

Authors:  Katie B Shannon; Julie C Canman; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Depletion of centromeric MCAK leads to chromosome congression and segregation defects due to improper kinetochore attachments.

Authors:  Susan L Kline-Smith; Alexey Khodjakov; Polla Hergert; Claire E Walczak
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Conformation-specific binding of p31(comet) antagonizes the function of Mad2 in the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Guohong Xia; Xuelian Luo; Toshiyuki Habu; Josep Rizo; Tomohiro Matsumoto; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The Caenorhabditis elegans kinetochore reorganizes at prometaphase and in response to checkpoint stimuli.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Stear; Mark B Roth
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  BubR1 is modified by sumoylation during mitotic progression.

Authors:  Feikun Yang; Liyan Hu; Cheng Chen; Jianxiu Yu; Christopher B O'Connell; Alexey Khodjakov; Michele Pagano; Wei Dai
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Spindle assembly checkpoint signalling is uncoupled from chromosomal position in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Liming Gui; Hayden Homer
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  A functional relationship between NuMA and kid is involved in both spindle organization and chromosome alignment in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Aime A Levesque; Louisa Howard; Michael B Gordon; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.