Literature DB >> 7096444

Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length.

T S Hays, D Wise, E D Salmon.   

Abstract

We are investigating the relation between the force pulling a kinetochore poleward and the length of the corresponding kinetochore fiber. It was recognized by Ostergren in 1950 (Hereditas 36:1-19) that the metaphase position of a chromosome could be achieved by a balance of traction forces were proportional to the distance from kinetochore to pole. For the typical chromosome (i.e., a meiotic bivalent or mitotic chromosome) with a single kinetochore fiber extending to each pole, the resultant force (RF) would equal zero when the chromosome lay at the midpoint between the two poles. For special chromosomes that have unequal numbers of kinetochore fibers extending towards opposite poles. For special chromosomes that have unequal numbers of kinetochore fibers extending towards opposite poles. For special chromosomes that have unequal numbers of kinetochore fibers extending towards opposite poles, Ostergren's proposal suggests that RF = 0 when the chromosome is shifted closer to the pole toward which the greater number of kinetochore fibers are pulling. We have measured the force-length relationship in living spindles by analyzing the metaphase positions of experimentally generated multivalent chromosomes having three or four kinetochore fibers. Multivalent chromosomes of varied configurations were generated by gamma-irradiation of nymphs of the grasshopper melanoplus differentialis, and their behavior was analyzed in living first meiotic spermocytes. The lengths of kinetochore fibers were determined from time-lapse photographs by measuring the kinetochore-to-pole distances for fully congressed chromosomes just before the onset of anaphase. In our analysis, force (F) along a single kinetochore fiber is expressed by: F = kL(exp), where k is a length-independent proportionality constant, L represents the kinetochore fiber length, and exp is an unknown exponent. The RF on a chromosome is then given by: RF = sigmak(i)L(i)(exp), where kinetochore fiber lengths in opposite half- spindles are given opposite sign. If forces on a metaphase chromosome are at equilibrium (RF = 0), then for asymmetrical orientations of multivalents we can measure the individual kinetochore fiber lengths (L(i)) and solve for the exponent that yields a resultant force of zero. The value of the exponent relates how the magnitude of force along a kinetochore fiber varies with its length. For six trivalents and one naturally occurring quadrivalent we calculated an average value of exp = 1.06 +/- 0.18. This result is consistent with Ostergren's hypothesis and indicates that the magnitude of poleward traction force along a kinetochore fiber is directly proportional to the length of the fiber. Our finding suggests that the balance of forces along a kinetochore fiber may be a major factor regulating the extent of kinetochore microtubule assembly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7096444      PMCID: PMC2112846          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  31 in total

1.  [An assembly hypothesis of chromosome movement and the changes of the spindle length during anaphase I in spermatocytes of Pales ferruginea].

Authors:  R Dietz
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  [Structure and function of the spindle apparatus].

Authors:  R Dietz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1969-05

3.  Interaction of microtubules and the mechanism of chromosome movement (zipper hypothesis). 1. General principle.

Authors:  A S Bajer
Journal:  Cytobios       Date:  1973-11

4.  Meiosis V: Matric and path coefficient solutions of tri- and quadrivalents.

Authors:  L T Douglas
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Sex chromosomes and karyotypes of the Alticidae (Coleoptera).

Authors:  N Virkki
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Sex chromosomes and meiotic mechanisms in some African and Australian mantids.

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1965-05-26       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Cellular mechanisms of chromosome distribution.

Authors:  P Luykx
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1970

8.  Ultrastructural analysis of mitotic spindle elongation in mammalian cells in vitro. Direct microtubule counts.

Authors:  B R Brinkley; J Cartwright
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Koch
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement.

Authors:  S Inoué; H Sato
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  41 in total

1.  The role of centromere alignment in meiosis I segregation of homologous chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C E Guerra; D B Kaback
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Principles of the highly ordered arrangement of metaphase I bivalents in spermatocytes of Agrodiaetus (Insecta, Lepidoptera).

Authors:  Vladimir A Lukhtanov; Alexander V Dantchenko
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Maloriented bivalents have metaphase positions at the spindle equator with more kinetochore microtubules to one pole than to the other.

Authors:  James R LaFountain; Rudolf Oldenbourg
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

5.  The road less traveled to the spindle equator.

Authors:  Shang Cai; Claire E Walczak
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Maturation of the kinetochore-microtubule interface and the meaning of metaphase.

Authors:  António J Pereira; Helder Maiato
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  A functional relationship between NuMA and kid is involved in both spindle organization and chromosome alignment in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Aime A Levesque; Louisa Howard; Michael B Gordon; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 9.  Force and length in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Sophie Dumont; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  How does a millimeter-sized cell find its center?

Authors:  Martin Wühr; Sophie Dumont; Aaron C Groen; Daniel J Needleman; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.