Literature DB >> 8326061

Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio.

C A Shera1, G Zweig.   

Abstract

The microstructure of threshold hearing curves and the frequency spectra of evoked otoacoustic emissions both often evince a roughly periodic series of maxima and minima. Current models for the generation of otoacoustic emissions explain the observed spectral regularity by supposing that since the cochlea maps frequency into position the spectral periodicity mirrors a spatial oscillation in the mechanics of the organ of Corti. In this view emissions are generated when forward-traveling waves reflect from periodic corrugations in the mechanics, suggesting that the amplitude of the cochlear waves at the stapes--should manifest pronounced maxima and minima with a corresponding periodicity. This paper describes measurements of stimulus-frequency emissions, establishes their analyticity properties, and uses them to explore the spatial distribution of mechanical inhomogeneities (emission "generators") in the human cochlea. The approximate form and frequency dependence of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio are determined noninvasively. The amplitude of the empirical traveling-wave ratio is a slowly varying, nonperiodic function of frequency, suggesting that the distribution of inhomogeneities is uncorrelated with the periodicity found in the threshold microstructure. The observed periodicities arise predominantly from the cyclic variation in relative phase between the forward- and backward-traveling waves at the stapes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8326061     DOI: 10.1121/1.405717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Otoacoustic emissions from residual oscillations of the cochlear basilar membrane in a human ear model.

Authors:  Renato Nobili; Ales Vetesnik; Lorenzo Turicchia; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Accuracy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions-based ototoxicity monitoring using various primary frequency step-sizes.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.

Authors:  Sriram Boothalingam; Julianne Kurke; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-07

5.  Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Level dependence of distortion product otoacoustic emission phase is attributed to component mixing.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-16

10.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.