Literature DB >> 22676700

Accuracy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions-based ototoxicity monitoring using various primary frequency step-sizes.

Garnett P McMillan1, Dawn Konrad-Martin, Marilyn F Dille.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A cisplatin ototoxicity monitoring protocol was recently proposed using distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) measured in 1/48th octave steps over the highest obtainable quarter octave ( Dille et al, 2010 ). This protocol can take up to 40 minutes to complete in both ears among seriously ill patients in a potentially noisy test environment. The goal of the current study was to contrast the diagnostic accuracy of ototoxicity monitoring protocols based on changes in DPOAE levels at wider, more rapidly tested, primary frequency step sizes.
DESIGN: Measure DPOAE levels in 1/48th octave steps over the highest half-octave of obtainable DPOAEs prior to treatment and at each ototoxicity monitoring session during the course of treatment with cisplatin. STUDY SAMPLE: Nineteen cancer patients being treated with cisplatin at the Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center were observed over 56 monitoring appointments. Hearing thresholds in the sensitive region for ototoxicity (SRO) were measured concurrently with DPOAE levels.
RESULTS: DPOAE levels measured in 1/24th octave steps provided comparable accuracy, and half the testing time, to the 1/48th octave step protocol previously described.
CONCLUSIONS: DPOAE level shifts measured in 1/24th octave steps may provide a basis for rapid ototoxicity monitoring among adult cancer patients treated with cisplatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22676700      PMCID: PMC5549624          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.688143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  11 in total

1.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) input/output functions and the influence of the second DPOAE source.

Authors:  Manfred Mauermann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Ototoxicity risk assessment combining distortion product otoacoustic emissions with a cisplatin dose model.

Authors:  Marilyn F Dille; Garnett P McMillan; Kelly M Reavis; Peter Jacobs; Stephen A Fausti; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.

Authors:  D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of aspirin on distortion product fine structure: interpreted by the two-source model for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generation.

Authors:  Aparna Rao; Glenis R Long
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Development and validation of a cisplatin dose-ototoxicity model.

Authors:  Marilyn F Dille; Debra Wilmington; Garnett P McMillan; Wendy Helt; Stephen A Fausti; Dawn Konrad-Martin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man.

Authors:  A M Brown; D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.

Authors:  N J He; R A Schmiedt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures.

Authors:  G K Martin; B L Lonsbury-Martin; R Probst; S A Scheinin; A C Coats
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wagner; Peter K Plinkert; Reinhard Vonthein; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  6 in total

1.  Characteristics of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission in a normal hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungmee Lee; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The influence of self-reported noise exposure on 2ƒ12 distortion product otoacoustic emission level, fine structure, and components in a normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Applying U.S. national guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring in adult patients: perspectives on patient populations, service gaps, barriers and solutions.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Gayla L Poling; Angela C Garinis; Candice E Ortiz; Jennifer Hopper; Keri O'Connell Bennett; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  The statistical basis for serial monitoring in audiology.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Kelly M Reavis; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Tanisha L Hammill; William J Murphy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Early Physiological and Cellular Indicators of Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.

Authors:  Yingying Chen; Eric C Bielefeld; Jeffrey G Mellott; Weijie Wang; Amir M Mafi; Ebenezer N Yamoah; Jianxin Bao
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.