Literature DB >> 30014309

Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

Karolina K Charaziak1, Jonathan H Siegel2, Christopher A Shera3,4.   

Abstract

The cochlear microphonic (CM) results from the vector sum of outer hair cell transduction currents excited by a stimulus. The classical theory of CM generation-that the response measured at the round window is dominated by cellular sources located within the tail region of the basilar membrane (BM) excitation pattern-predicts that CM amplitude and phase vary little with stimulus frequency. Contrary to expectations, CM amplitude and phase-gradient delay measured in response to low-level tones in chinchillas demonstrate a striking, quasiperiodic pattern of spectral ripples, even at frequencies > 5 kHz, where interference with neurophonic potentials is unlikely. The spectral ripples were reduced in the presence of a moderate-level saturating tone at a nearby frequency. When converted to the time domain, only the delayed CM energy was diminished in the presence of the saturator. We hypothesize that the ripples represent an interference pattern produced by CM components with different phase gradients: an early-latency component originating within the tail region of the BM excitation and two delayed components that depend on active cochlear processing near the peak region of the traveling wave. Using time windowing, we show that the early, middle, and late components have delays corresponding to estimated middle-ear transmission, cochlear forward delays, and cochlear round-trip delays, respectively. By extending the classical model of CM generation to include mechanical and electrical irregularities, we propose that middle components are generated through a mechanism of "coherent summation" analogous to the production of reflection-source otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), while the late components arise through a process of internal cochlear reflection related to the generation of stimulus-frequency OAEs. Although early-latency components from the passive tail region typically dominate the round-window CM, at low stimulus levels, substantial contributions from components shaped by active cochlear processing provide a new avenue for improving CM measurements as assays of cochlear health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlea; cochlear microphonic; cochlear microphonic model

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30014309      PMCID: PMC6081886          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0668-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  50 in total

1.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Loud sound-induced changes in cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Anders Fridberger; Jiefu Zheng; Anand Parthasarathi; Tianying Ren; Alfred Nuttall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comparison of synchronization filters in different auditory receptor organs.

Authors:  T F Weiss; C Rose
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions.

Authors:  E Zwicker; E Schloth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some electrical circuit properties of the organ of Corti. II. Analysis including reactive elements.

Authors:  P Dallos
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Stapes Vibration in the Chinchilla Middle Ear: Relation to Behavioral and Auditory-Nerve Thresholds.

Authors:  Luis Robles; Andrei N Temchin; Yun-Hui Fan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-12

9.  Using the cochlear microphonic as a tool to evaluate cochlear function in mouse models of hearing.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Khurram Naik; Peter Dallos
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-19

10.  The group delay and suppression pattern of the cochlear microphonic potential recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Edward Porsov; David Kemp; Alfred L Nuttall; Tianying Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Adaptation of Cochlear Amplification to Low Endocochlear Potential.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Elika Fallah; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Model of cochlear microphonic explores the tuning and magnitude of hair cell transduction current.

Authors:  Brian Frost; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.699

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.