Literature DB >> 3213603

Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis.

R B Mazess1, H Barden, M Ettinger, E Schultz.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 140 normal young women (aged 20 to 39 years) and in 423 consecutive women over age 40 referred for evaluation of osteoporosis. Lumbar spine and proximal femur BMD was measured using dual-photon absorptiometry (153Gd), whereas the radius shaft measurement used single-photon absorptiometry (125I). There were 324 older women with no fractures, of which 278 aged 60 to 80 years served as age-matched controls. There were 99 women with fractures including 32 with vertebral and 22 with hip fractures. Subsequently, another 25 women with hip fractures had BMD measured in another laboratory; their mean BMD was within 2% of that of the original series. The mean age in both the nonfracture and fracture groups was 70 +/- 5 years. The BMD in the age-matched controls was 20% to 25% below that of normal young women for the radius, spine, and femur, but the Ward's triangle region of the femur showed even greater loss (35%). The mean BMD at all sites in the crush fracture cases was about 10% to 15% below that of age-matched controls. Spinal abnormality was best discriminated by spine and femoral measurements (Z score about 0.9). In women with hip fractures, the BMD was 10% below that of age-matched controls for the radius and the spine, and the BMD for the femoral sites was about 25% to 30% below that of age-matched control (Z score about 1.6). Femoral densities gave the best discrimination of hip fracture cases and even reflected spinal osteopenia. In contrast, neither the spine nor the radius reflected the full extent of femoral osteopenia in hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3213603     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650030104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  42 in total

1.  The physical consequences of depressive illness.

Authors:  T G Dinan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-27

2.  Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; B Buchs; F Piana; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

5.  Bone mass and fracture.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus: a sensitive and specific discriminator of osteopenia in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Agren; A Karellas; D Leahey; S Marks; D Baran
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The impact of clothing style on bone mineral density among women in Turkey.

Authors:  D Alper Hayirlioglu; Husnu Gokaslan; Canan Cimsit; N Ozden Serin
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Familiality and partitioning the variability of femoral bone mineral density in women of child-bearing age.

Authors:  M R Sowers; M Boehnke; M L Jannausch; M Crutchfield; G Corton; T L Burns
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Design of the Fracture Intervention Trial.

Authors:  D M Black; T F Reiss; M C Nevitt; J Cauley; D Karpf; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.