Literature DB >> 8150954

Evaluation of differential inoculum disk diffusion method and Vitek GPS-SA card for detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci.

C C Knapp1, M D Ludwig, J A Washington.   

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to compare the accuracy of detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci, defined by microdilution MICs, population analyses, and mec gene hybridization, with the Vitek GPS-SA Susceptibility Card with that of the standard inoculum (10(7) CFU) and high-inoculum (10(9) CFU) disk diffusion tests. By the standard inoculum disk diffusion test, 10 of 67 (15%) isolates of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 3 of 47 (6%) isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis were falsely susceptible after 24 h of incubation at 35 degrees C. By the high-inoculum disk diffusion test (10(9) CFU), 4 of the 10 isolates of S. aureus remained falsely susceptible, whereas none of the isolates of S. epidermidis was falsely susceptible. Of the 10 isolates of S. aureus falsely susceptible by the standard disk test, only one remained falsely susceptible after an additional 24 h of incubation at 22 degrees C. All four isolates of S. aureus that were falsely susceptible by the high-inoculum disk diffusion test after 24 h of incubation at 35 degrees C became resistant after an additional 24 h of incubation at 22 degrees C. Thus, extended incubation of both the standard and high-inoculum disk diffusion tests increased their accuracy in detecting oxacillin resistance. All isolates of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci were accurately detected with the Vitek software upgrades (6.1 and 7.1) of the GPS-SA card.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8150954      PMCID: PMC263049          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.2.433-436.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Stable classes of phenotypic expression in methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Tomasz; S Nachman; H Leaf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Evaluation of the newly modified AutoMicrobic system gram-positive susceptibility-MIC card for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R T Lally; M N Ederer; B F Woolfrey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Multiple mechanisms of methicillin resistance and improved methods for detection in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H de Lencastre; A M Sá Figueiredo; C Urban; J Rahal; A Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  New mechanism for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: clinical isolates that lack the PBP 2a gene and contain normal penicillin-binding proteins with modified penicillin-binding capacity.

Authors:  A Tomasz; H B Drugeon; H M de Lencastre; D Jabes; L McDougall; J Bille
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative evaluation of four systems for determining susceptibility of gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  D Henry; L Kunzer; J Ngui-Yen; J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Expression of methicillin resistance in heterogeneous strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B J Hartman; A Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Evaluation of commercial and standard methodology for determination of oxacillin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Skulnick; A E Simor; D Gregson; M Patel; G W Small; B Kreiswirth; D Hathoway; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Detection of intrinsically resistant (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus with the Sceptor and AutoMicrobic systems.

Authors:  S L Hansen; T J Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Evaluation of Alamar colorimetric broth microdilution susceptibility testing method for staphylococci and enterococci.

Authors:  C N Baker; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of disk diffusion, the E test, and detection of mecA for determination of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  J G Mulder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  European multicentre evaluation of a commercial system for identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  G Zambardi; J Fleurette; G C Schito; R Auckenthaler; E Bergogne-Berezin; R Hone; A King; W Lenz; C Lohner; A Makristhatis; F Marco; C Müller-Serieys; C Nonhoff; I Phillips; P Rohner; M Rotter; K P Schaal; M Struelens; A Viebahn
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of Vitek GPS-SA card for testing of oxacillin against borderline-susceptible staphylococci that lack mec.

Authors:  C C Knapp; M D Ludwig; J A Washington; H F Chambers
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Misclassification of susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus as methicillin-resistant S. aureus By a rapid automated susceptibility testing system.

Authors:  J Ribeiro; F D Vieira; T King; J B D'Arezzo; J M Boyce
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  P Kohner; J Uhl; C Kolbert; D Persing; F Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci by commercially available fluorescence test.

Authors:  M Ieven; H Jansens; D Ursi; J Verhoeven; H Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M M Baddour; M M AbuElKheir; A J Fatani
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Biosensor for detection of antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus bacteria.

Authors:  Rajesh Guntupalli; Iryna Sorokulova; Eric Olsen; Ludmila Globa; Oleg Pustovyy; Vitaly Vodyanoy
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.