Literature DB >> 8897159

Evaluation of Alamar colorimetric broth microdilution susceptibility testing method for staphylococci and enterococci.

C N Baker1, F C Tenover.   

Abstract

We compared the results of the Alamar broth microdilution susceptibility testing method with the results of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth microdilution method for 119 gram-positive organisms. The strains were tested for their susceptibilities to 20 antimicrobial agents. Only appropriate antimicrobial agents were evaluated for each species of bacteria. Absolute categorical agreement between the reference method and the test method was 91.5% for enterococci, 99.8% for oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci, and 97.4% for oxacillin-resistant staphylococci. Essential agreement (percent complete agreement plus percent minor errors) was > 99% for all organisms tested. The results for enterococci showed no very major errors, one major error with ofloxacin, and numerous minor errors with the quinolones. However, all except one of the minor errors were within +/- 1 log2 dilution of the reference result. For staphylococci, only 2 very major errors (one each with chloramphenicol and oxacillin), 1 major error (chloramphenicol), and 15 minor errors (multiple drugs) were observed. The Alamar colorimetric system was easy to use and the results were easy to read. It appears to be an acceptable method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of staphylococci and enterococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8897159      PMCID: PMC229380          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.11.2654-2659.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.

Authors:  C N Baker; S A Stocker; D H Culver; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of a highly automated 5-h susceptibility testing system, the Cobas-Bact, with two reference methods: Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and broth microdilution.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci by the Alamar MIC system.

Authors:  R J Zabransky; A R Dinuzzo; G L Woods
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Ability of commercial and reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

Authors:  F C Tenover; J M Swenson; C M O'Hara; S A Stocker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multisite reproducibility of colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; Q Vu; M Lancaster; A Espinel-Ingroff; A Fothergill; C Grant; M R McGinnis; L Pasarell; M G Rinaldi; L Steele-Moore
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of Alamar colorimetric MIC method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  C N Baker; S N Banerjee; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus species.

Authors:  B M Willey; B N Kreiswirth; A E Simor; G Willaims; S R Scriver; A Phillips; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Ability of clinical laboratories to detect antimicrobial agent-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  F C Tenover; J Tokars; J Swenson; S Paul; K Spitalny; W Jarvis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Development of a standardized screening method for detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  J M Swenson; N C Clark; M J Ferraro; D F Sahm; G Doern; M A Pfaller; L B Reller; M P Weinstein; R J Zabransky; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evidence that the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards disk test is less sensitive than the screen plate for detection of low-expression-class methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A M Mackenzie; H Richardson; R Lannigan; D Wood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  25 in total

1.  Linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain 1128105, the first known clinical isolate possessing the cfr multidrug resistance gene.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Locke; Douglas E Zuill; Caitlyn R Scharn; Jennifer Deane; Daniel F Sahm; Gerald A Denys; Richard V Goering; Karen J Shaw
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Unacceptable performance and the lack of reproducibility results in the report of colorimetric methods for early detection of vancomycin and oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ibrahim C Acuner; Cafer Eroglu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Determination of vancomycin and daptomycin MICs by different testing methods for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mark C Kruzel; Cole T Lewis; Kerry J Welsh; Evan M Lewis; Nicola E Dundas; John F Mohr; Lisa Y Armitige; Audrey Wanger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of vancomycin susceptibility testing for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of Etest and three automated testing methods.

Authors:  Michael J Rybak; Celine Vidaillac; Helio S Sader; Paul R Rhomberg; Hossein Salimnia; Lawrence E Briski; Audrey Wanger; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Screening a Commercial Library of Pharmacologically Active Small Molecules against Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms.

Authors:  Nelson S Torres; Johnathan J Abercrombie; Anand Srinivasan; Jose L Lopez-Ribot; Anand K Ramasubramanian; Kai P Leung
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  P Kohner; J Uhl; C Kolbert; D Persing; F Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Structure-activity relationships of diverse oxazolidinones for linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains possessing the cfr methyltransferase gene or ribosomal mutations.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Locke; John Finn; Mark Hilgers; Gracia Morales; Shahad Rahawi; Kedar G C; Juan José Picazo; Weonbin Im; Karen Joy Shaw; Jeffrey L Stein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Rapid colorimetric assay for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Michael M Tunney; Gordon Ramage; Tyler R Field; Thomas F Moriarty; Douglas G Storey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Novel ribosomal mutations in Staphylococcus aureus strains identified through selection with the oxazolidinones linezolid and torezolid (TR-700).

Authors:  Jeffrey B Locke; Mark Hilgers; Karen Joy Shaw
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Evaluation of a novel automated chemiluminescent assay system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Isao Manome; Masanari Ikedo; Yoshihiko Saito; Keiko Kumura Ishii; Mitsuo Kaku
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.