Literature DB >> 8874074

Comparison of disk diffusion, the E test, and detection of mecA for determination of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

J G Mulder1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to find a reliable, fast, and simple alternative to the methicillin disk method for determination of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci, since results of this method are often difficult to read due to growth within the zone of inhibition. The sensitivity of 319 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci to a 5 microgram methicillin disk on Mueller-Hinton agar using an incubation period of 48 h was compared with that of 1 microgram and 5 micrograms oxacillin disks on Mueller-Hinton agar with or without 2% NaCl, using an incubation period of 24 h. The detection of mecA (MecAgen) by the polymerase chain reaction was used as a standard. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined by means of the E test. Of the 225 mecA-positive strains, 190, 215, and 193 were resistant to 5 micrograms methicillin, 1 microgram oxacillin and 5 micrograms oxacillin disks on Mueller-Hinton agar, respectively, and 216, 218, and 223 were resistant on Mueller-Hinton agar with 2% NaCl. Of the 94 mecA-negative strains, 89, 93, and 94 were susceptible to 5 micrograms methicillin, 1 microgram oxacillin, and 5 micrograms oxacillin disks on Mueller-Hinton agar, respectively, and 92, 93, and 94 were susceptible on Mueller-Hinton agar with 2% NaCl. Using breakpoints of 2 micrograms/ml for oxacillin resistance and 8 micrograms/ml for methicillin resistance, the E test yielded sensitivities of 99.6 and 99.1% and specificities of 97.9 and 98.9% after 48 h of incubation. The 5 microgram oxacillin disk was faster and easier to read than the methicillin disk and correlated better with detection of mecA than the methicillin disk of the 1 microgram oxacillin disk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874074     DOI: 10.1007/bf01709365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  26 in total

1.  Screening tests for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  G Hedin; A Hambraeus
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Evaluation of laboratory tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  P E Coudron; D L Jones; H P Dalton; G L Archer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Species-specific identification of methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  A C Petersson; H Miörner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Use of the E test for methicillin sensitivity testing.

Authors:  G E Bignardi; U Riley; C S Easmon
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  New recommendations for disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility tests for methicillin-resistant (heteroresistant) staphylococci.

Authors:  L K McDougal; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological aspects of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L A Herwaldt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  G L Woods; G S Hall; I Rutherford; K J Pratt; C C Knapp
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Identification of Staphylococcus species with the API STAPH-IDENT system.

Authors:  W E Kloos; J F Wolfshohl
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Revised interpretation of oxacillin MICs for Staphylococcus epidermidis based on mecA detection.

Authors:  C L McDonald; W E Maher; R J Fass
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genetic methods for assessing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  F R Cockerill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  P Kohner; J Uhl; C Kolbert; D Persing; F Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Branched-DNA assay for detection of the mecA gene in oxacillin-resistant and oxacillin-sensitive staphylococci.

Authors:  C P Kolbert; J Arruda; P Varga-Delmore; X Zheng; M Lewis; J Kolberg; D H Persing
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from clinical specimens in Ardabil, Iran.

Authors:  Solmaz Dibah; Mohsen Arzanlou; Elham Jannati; Reza Shapouri
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2014-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.