Literature DB >> 17924164

Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

M M Baddour1, M M AbuElKheir, A J Fatani.   

Abstract

In the present study, several conventional methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of mecA gene-positive isolates. Cefoxitin E-test was also evaluated as a possible phenotypic method of MRSA detection. Oxacillin agar screen and PBP2' latex agglutination methods were found to be more sensitive than oxacillin and cefoxitin disk-diffusion methods. Cefoxitin disk diffusion was found to be the most specific. A combination of oxacillin agar screening with cefoxitin disk diffusion, or oxacillin disk diffusion with PBP2', improved sensitivity and specificity. Cefoxitin E-test with the current break points had low sensitivity and specificity (33.3% and 75%, respectively) for the detection of MRSA. However, changing the break points to <or= 4 microg/ml and to >or= 6 microg/ml for sensitive and resistant, respectively, greatly improved both. Changing the 30-microg cefoxitin disk-diffusion break points to <or= 21 mm for resistant slightly improved sensitivity but had no effect on specificity. It was therefore concluded that the use of more than one screening method is necessary to detect all MRSA isolates in clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924164     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-007-9015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  27 in total

1.  Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Zurich, Switzerland (2003): prevalence of type IV SCCmec and a new SCCmec element associated with isolates from intravenous drug users.

Authors:  Wei Qi; Miriam Ender; Frances O'Brien; Alexander Imhof; Christian Ruef; Nadine McCallum; Brigitte Berger-Bächi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Molecular characterisation of a dominant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone in a Mexican hospital (1999-2003).

Authors:  G Echániz-Aviles; M E Velázquez-Meza; M Aires-de-Sousa; R Morfín-Otero; E Rodríguez-Noriega; N Carnalla-Barajas; S Esparza-Ahumada; H de Lencastre
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 3.  Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): disease spectrum, biological characteristics, resistant mechanisms, and typing methods.

Authors:  R A Abdo; G F Araj; R S Talhouk
Journal:  J Med Liban       Date:  1996

4.  The practical use of PCR for rapid detection of methicillin resistance among staphylococcal clinical isolates from Turkish hospitals.

Authors:  S Kocagöz; S Unal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Phenotypic detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by disk diffusion testing and Etest on Mueller-Hinton agar.

Authors:  R Skov; R Smyth; A R Larsen; A Bolmstrôm; A Karlsson; K Mills; N Frimodt-Moller; G Kahlmeter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  S M Salisbury; L M Sabatini; C A Spiegel
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Optimal inoculation methods and quality control for the NCCLS oxacillin agar screen test for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Swenson; J Spargo; F C Tenover; M J Ferraro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Methods for identifying methicillin resistancein Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R W Smyth; G Kahlmeter; B Olsson Liljequist; B Hoffman
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 9.  Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Factors affecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.283

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Current diagnostic tools for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Julianna Kurlenda; Mariusz Grinholc
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Comparison of real-time PCR with disk diffusion, agar screen and E-test methods for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Laleh Shariati; Majid Validi; Mohammad Amin Tabatabaiefar; Ali Karimi; Mohammad Reza Nafisi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Hemoculture and Direct Sputum Detection of mecA-Mediated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification in Combination With a Lateral-Flow Dipstick.

Authors:  Kawin Nawattanapaiboon; Photchanathorn Prombun; Pitak Santanirand; Apirom Vongsakulyanon; Toemsak Srikhirin; Boonsong Sutapun; Wansika Kiatpathomchai
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Impairments of mecA gene detection in bovine Staphylococcus spp.

Authors:  Dayanne Araújo de Melo; Irene da Silva Coelho; Cássia Couto da Motta; Anna Carolina Coelho Marín Rojas; Felipe Carlos Dubenczuk; Shana de Mattos de Oliveira Coelho; Miliane Moreira Soares de Souza
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.476

5.  Genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman reveals the dominance of Panton-Valentine leucocidin-negative ST6-IV/t304 clone.

Authors:  E E Udo; B A-H Al-Lawati; Z Al-Muharmi; S S Thukral
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2014-05-27

6.  Identification and antimicrobial resistance prevalence of pathogenic Escherichia coli strains from treated wastewater effluents in Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Authors:  Martins A Adefisoye; Anthony I Okoh
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Antibiotic resistance genes & susceptibility patterns in staphylococci.

Authors:  Nizami Duran; Burcin Ozer; Gulay Gulbol Duran; Yusuf Onlen; Cemil Demir
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a university hospital located in the Northeast of Brazil.

Authors:  Francisco Canindé de Sousa Júnior; Gildelane da Silva Néri; Ana Karine Silva; Bibiana Priscila Rodrigues Câmara de Araújo; Myrian Júlia de Paiva Dourado Guerra; Maria José de Britto Costa Fernandes; Eveline Pipolo Milan; Maria Celeste Nunes de Melo
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

9.  The comparison of Staphylococcus aureus types 5 and 8 with respect to methicillin resistance in patients admitted to Al-Zahra Hospital by PCR.

Authors:  Seyed Asghar Havaei; Sharareh Moghim; Ali Mohamadi Bardebari; Tahmineh Narimani; Amir Azimian; Mojtaba Akbari
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2013-03-06

10.  Antimicrobial resistance and characterisation of staphylococci isolated from healthy Labrador retrievers in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Vanessa M Schmidt; Nicola J Williams; Gina Pinchbeck; Caroline E Corless; Stephen Shaw; Neil McEwan; Susan Dawson; Tim Nuttall
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.