Literature DB >> 8094697

Rates of DNA evolution in Drosophila depend on function and developmental stage of expression.

J R Powell1, A Caccone, J M Gleason, L Nigro.   

Abstract

DNA-sequence divergence of genes expressed in the embryonic stage was compared with the divergence of genes expressed in adults for 13 species of Drosophila representing various degrees of relatedness. DNA-DNA hybridization experiments were conducted using as tracers complementary DNA (cDNA) reversed transcribed from poly(A)+ mRNA isolated from different developmental stages. The results indicate: (1) cDNA is less diverged than total single-copy DNA; (2) cDNA sequences are not in the rapidly evolving fraction of the single-copy genome of Drosophila; (3) early in evolutionary divergence embryonic messages are about half as diverged as adult messages; sequence data from some of the species compared indicate this is likely due to differences in rates of silent substitutions in genes expressed at different stages of development; and (4) at greater evolutionary distance, the differences in embryonic and adult messages disappear; this could be due to lineage-specific shifts in codon usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8094697      PMCID: PMC1205319     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  24 in total

1.  Alteration of the Q family of transfer RNAs in adult Drosophila melanogaster as a function of age, nutrition, and genotype.

Authors:  R K Owenby; M P Stulberg; K B Jacobson
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.432

2.  Calculation of sequence divergence from the thermal stability of DNA heteroduplexes.

Authors:  M S Springer; E H Davidson; R J Britten
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Evolutionary conservation of DNA sequences expressed in sea urchin eggs and early embryos.

Authors:  J W Roberts; S A Johnson; P Kier; T J Hall; E H Davidson; R J Britten
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Evolutionary distances in Hawaiian Drosophila measured by DNA reassociation.

Authors:  J A Hunt; T J Hall; R J Britten
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity.

Authors:  R Grantham; C Gautier; M Gouy; M Jacobzone; R Mercier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Alteration of the relative stability of dA-dT and dG-dC base pairs in DNA.

Authors:  W B Melchior; P H Von Hippel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA sequence comparison among closely related Drosophila species in the mulleri complex.

Authors:  D H Schulze; C S Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes.

Authors:  H Grosjean; W Fiers
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Evidence for a complex class of nonadenylated mRNA in Drosophila.

Authors:  J L Zimmerman; D L Fouts; J E Manning
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Queuosine modification of the wobble base in tRNAHis influences 'in vivo' decoding properties.

Authors:  F Meier; B Suter; H Grosjean; G Keith; E Kubli
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  A screen for fast evolving genes from Drosophila.

Authors:  K J Schmid; D Tautz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein evolution in the context of Drosophila development.

Authors:  Jerel C Davis; Onn Brandman; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Fast sequence evolution of Hox and Hox-derived genes in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Sònia Casillas; Bárbara Negre; Antonio Barbadilla; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Interchromosomal duplications on the Bactrocera oleae Y chromosome imply a distinct evolutionary origin of the sex chromosomes compared to Drosophila.

Authors:  Paolo Gabrieli; Ludvik M Gomulski; Angelica Bonomi; Paolo Siciliano; Francesca Scolari; Gerald Franz; Andrew Jessup; Anna R Malacrida; Giuliano Gasperi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genome-wide patterns of codon bias are shaped by natural selection in the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  Kord M Kober; Grant H Pogson
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.154

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.