Literature DB >> 9275195

A screen for fast evolving genes from Drosophila.

K J Schmid1, D Tautz.   

Abstract

In an attempt to quantify the rates of protein sequence divergence in Drosophila, we have devised a screen to differentiate between slow and fast evolving genes. We find that over one-third of randomly drawn cDNAs from a Drosophila melanogaster library do not cross-hybridize with Drosophila virilis DNA, indicating that they evolve with a very high rate. To determine the evolutionary characteristics of such protein sequences, we sequenced their homologs from a more closely related species (Drosophila yakuba). The amino acid substitution rates among these cDNAs are among the fastest known and several are only about 2-fold lower than the corresponding values for silent substitutions. An analysis of within-species polymorphisms for one of these sequences reveals an exceptionally high number of polymorphic amino acid positions, indicating that the protein is not under strong negative selection. We conclude that the Drosophila genome harbors a substantial proportion of genes with a very high divergence rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9275195      PMCID: PMC23261          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

Review 1.  Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  M C King; A C Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  How big is the universe of exons?

Authors:  R L Dorit; L Schoenbach; W Gilbert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment.

Authors:  C Sander; R Schneider
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1991

4.  Interspecific comparison of the transformer gene of Drosophila reveals an unusually high degree of evolutionary divergence.

Authors:  M T O'Neil; J M Belote
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Rates of DNA evolution in Drosophila depend on function and developmental stage of expression.

Authors:  J R Powell; A Caccone; J M Gleason; L Nigro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback.

Authors:  D Tautz; C Pfeifle
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  The homeotic gene spalt (sal) evolved during Drosophila speciation.

Authors:  D Reuter; R Schuh; H Jäckle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Molecular evolution in the Drosophila yakuba period locus.

Authors:  J R Thackeray; C P Kyriacou
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A survey of expressed genes in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  R Waterston; C Martin; M Craxton; C Huynh; A Coulson; L Hillier; R Durbin; P Green; R Shownkeen; N Halloran
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  41 in total

1.  A question of size: the eukaryotic proteome and the problems in defining it.

Authors:  Paul M Harrison; Anuj Kumar; Ning Lang; Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Conserved domains control heterochromatin localization and silencing properties of SU(VAR)3-7.

Authors:  Yannis Jaquet; Marion Delattre; Juan Montoya-Burgos; Anne Spierer; Pierre Spierer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  E(var)3-9 of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a zinc finger protein.

Authors:  Karen S Weiler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  HipHop interacts with HOAP and HP1 to protect Drosophila telomeres in a sequence-independent manner.

Authors:  Guanjun Gao; Jean-Claude Walser; Michelle L Beaucher; Patrizia Morciano; Natalia Wesolowska; Jie Chen; Yikang S Rong
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  Measuring genome evolution.

Authors:  M A Huynen; P Bork
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  From genes to individuals: developmental genes and the generation of the phenotype.

Authors:  D Tautz; K J Schmid
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A targeted approach to the identification of candidate genes determining susceptibility to Plasmodium gallinaceum in Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  I Morlais; A Mori; J R Schneider; D W Severson
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  The evolutionary analysis of "orphans" from the Drosophila genome identifies rapidly diverging and incorrectly annotated genes.

Authors:  K J Schmid; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Repeated evolution of testis-specific new genes: the case of telomere-capping genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Dubruille; Gabriel A B Marais; Benjamin Loppin
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-07-11

10.  Molecular population genetics and evolution of Drosophila meiosis genes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Anderson; William D Gilliland; Charles H Langley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.