Literature DB >> 15909223

Protein evolution in the context of Drosophila development.

Jerel C Davis1, Onn Brandman, Dmitri A Petrov.   

Abstract

The tempo at which a protein evolves depends not only on the rate at which mutations arise but also on the selective effects that those mutations have at the organismal level. It is intuitive that proteins functioning during different stages of development may be predisposed to having mutations of different selective effects. For example, it has been hypothesized that changes to proteins expressed during early development should have larger phenotypic consequences because later stages depend on them. Conversely, changes to proteins expressed much later in development should have smaller consequences at the organismal level. Here we assess whether proteins expressed at different times during Drosophila development vary systematically in their rates of evolution. We find that proteins expressed early in development and particularly during mid-late embryonic development evolve unusually slowly. In addition, proteins expressed in adult males show an elevated evolutionary rate. These two trends are independent of each other and cannot be explained by peculiar rates of mutation or levels of codon bias. Moreover, the observed patterns appear to hold across several functional classes of genes, although the exact developmental time of the slowest protein evolution differs among each class. We discuss our results in connection with data on the evolution of development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15909223     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0241-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  37 in total

1.  The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms.

Authors:  W Arthur
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Nucleotide substitutions and the evolution of duplicate genes.

Authors:  J S Conery; M Lynch
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2001

3.  Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict.

Authors:  S Gavrilets
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila.

Authors:  P J Clyne; C G Warr; J R Carlson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Adaptation and the cost of complexity.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module.

Authors:  G von Dassow; E Meir; E M Munro; G M Odell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Protein dispensability and rate of evolution.

Authors:  A E Hirsh; H B Fraser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man.

Authors:  G J Wyckoff; W Wang; C I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila.

Authors:  W J Swanson; A G Clark; H M Waldrip-Dail; M F Wolfner; C F Aquadro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  30 in total

1.  A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns.

Authors:  Tomislav Domazet-Lošo; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model.

Authors:  Alex T Kalinka; Karolina M Varga; Dave T Gerrard; Stephan Preibisch; David L Corcoran; Julia Jarrells; Uwe Ohler; Casey M Bergman; Pavel Tomancak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparison of diverse developmental transcriptomes reveals that coexpression of gene neighbors is not evolutionarily conserved.

Authors:  Itai Yanai; Craig P Hunter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Comparative embryology without a microscope: using genomic approaches to understand the evolution of development.

Authors:  David A Garfield; Gregory A Wray
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2009-07-21

5.  Molecular signaling in zebrafish development and the vertebrate phylotypic period.

Authors:  Aurélie Comte; Julien Roux; Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Whole-genome positive selection and habitat-driven evolution in a shallow and a deep-sea urchin.

Authors:  Thomas A Oliver; David A Garfield; Mollie K Manier; Ralph Haygood; Gregory A Wray; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Limited gene misregulation is exacerbated by allele-specific upregulation in lethal hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Kevin H-C Wei; Andrew G Clark; Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Ontogeny and phylogeny: molecular signatures of selection, constraint, and temporal pleiotropy in the development of Drosophila.

Authors:  Carlo G Artieri; Wilfried Haerty; Rama S Singh
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Functional and evolutionary correlates of gene constellations in the Drosophila melanogaster genome that deviate from the stereotypical gene architecture.

Authors:  Shuwei Li; Ching-Hua Shih; Michael H Kohn
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.