Literature DB >> 3721196

DNA sequence comparison among closely related Drosophila species in the mulleri complex.

D H Schulze, C S Lee.   

Abstract

DNA hybridization was used to establish DNA sequence relationships among seven Drosophila species. Single-copy DNA was isolated from four species within the Drosophila mulleri complex, D. mojavensis, D. arizonensis, D. ritae and D. starmeri. These single-copy DNAs were used as tracers to be hybridized with each other and one additional member of the mulleri complex, D. aldrichi, a member of a closely related complex, D. hydei, and a distantly related species, D. melanogaster. Two methods have been used to determine the relatedness between these species: (1) the extent of duplex formed as measured by binding to hydroxyapatite and (2) the thermal stability of the duplexed DNA. Moderately repetitive DNA was purified from these species and used similarly to determine the divergence of this family of sequences. The rate of nucleotide substitution was estimated to be 0.2 +/-, 0.1% base pair change per million years for both single-copy and middle-repetitive DNAs. The size of the D. arizonensis genome, a representative of the mulleri complex, was calculated to be 2.2 X 10(8) base pairs from its kinetic complexity similar to that of D. hydei. The relative amounts (18%) and average reiteration frequency (100 copies) of the middle-repetitive DNA are similar for all Drosophila species studied. Finally, the data are presented in a phylogenetic tree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3721196      PMCID: PMC1202839     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

1.  NUCLEOTIDE COMPOSITION OF SHORT SEGMENTS OF DNA MOLECULES.

Authors:  Y MIYAZAWA; C A THOMAS
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Congruency of phylogenies derived from different proteins. A molecular analysis of the phylogenetic position of cracid birds.

Authors:  E M Prager; A C Wilson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1976-12-31       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  The replicative organization of DNA in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila hydei.

Authors:  M P Mulder; P van Duijn; H J Gloor
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Nonrepetitive DNA sequence representation in sea urchin embryo messenger RNA.

Authors:  R B Goldberg; G A Galau; R J Britten; E H Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effect of chemical modification on the rate of renaturation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Deaminated and glyoxalated deoxyribonucleic acid.

Authors:  J R Hutton; J G Wetmur
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1973-01-30       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Rate of fixation of nucleotide substitutions in evolution.

Authors:  C D Laird; B L McConaughy; B J McCarthy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Repetitive sequences in isolated Thomas circles from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  F H Schachat; D S Hogness
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1974

Review 8.  Genetic programming for development in Drosophila.

Authors:  J W Fristrom; M A Yund
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Biochem       Date:  1973-09

9.  Single copy DNA and structural gene sequence relationships among four sea urchin species.

Authors:  R C Angerer; E H Davidson; R J Britten
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-07-08       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Ubiquitous, interspersed repeated sequences in mammalian genomes.

Authors:  W R Jelinek; T P Toomey; L Leinwand; C H Duncan; P A Biro; P V Choudary; S M Weissman; C M Rubin; C M Houck; P L Deininger; C W Schmid
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  13 in total

1.  Complementary DNA-DNA hybridization in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Caccone; J M Gleason; J R Powell
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Extreme rates and heterogeneity in insect DNA evolution.

Authors:  A Caccone; J R Powell
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  DNA-DNA hybridization phylogeny of sand dollars and highly reproducible extent of hybridization values.

Authors:  C R Marshall; H Swift
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Rapid evolution in a fraction of the Drosophila nuclear genome.

Authors:  S D Werman; E H Davidson; R J Britten
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  J M Ranz; F Casals; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Indexes to the reassociation and stability of solution DNA hybrids.

Authors:  F H Sheldon; A H Bledsoe
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Testing chromosomal phylogenies and inversion breakpoint reuse in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Ferran Casals; Alfredo Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Rates of DNA evolution in Drosophila depend on function and developmental stage of expression.

Authors:  J R Powell; A Caccone; J M Gleason; L Nigro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Analysis of Drosophila species genome size and satellite DNA content reveals significant differences among strains as well as between species.

Authors:  Giovanni Bosco; Paula Campbell; Joao T Leiva-Neto; Therese A Markow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Characterization of the boundaries between adjacent rapidly and slowly evolving genomic regions in Drosophila.

Authors:  C H Martin; E M Meyerowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.