Literature DB >> 8070031

Etoposide dosage and pharmacodynamics.

S P Joel1, R Shah, M L Slevin.   

Abstract

Etoposide is a schedule-dependent cytotoxic drug with high single agent activity in small-cell lung cancer and lymphoma. Despite its clear dose-dependent myelosuppressive activity, dose-dependent evidence of its anti-tumour activity is harder to demonstrate. A number of reports have correlated haematological toxicity with pharmacokinetic and physiological parameters, which explains some of the variability in dynamic effects that exists between patients. Recent reports have also suggested that anti-tumour response may be related to plasma etoposide concentration. In our own studies we have investigated factors that influence the pharmacodynamic effects of etoposide, principally with regard to haematological toxicity, and these studies have highlighted a number of patient groups who are at risk. Impaired renal function causes a reduction in clearance of etoposide, resulting in increased systemic exposure and more profound myelotoxicity. A 30% dose reduction in this group is recommended to normalise the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Patients with low serum albumin concentrations (< 35 g/l) also showed significantly worse haematological toxicity, but with no apparent change in total drug pharmacokinetics. There was, however, an increase in the free drug fraction in this group due to decreased protein binding, such that the free drug AUC was similar to that found in patients with renal dysfunction. This would also indicate that a dose reduction of around 30%-40% is required in this patient group. Patients with normal albumin levels but liver enzyme values (aspartate transaminase or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase) more than 3 times the upper limit of normal also had a less marked but significant increase in neutropenia. In patients with normal organ function, age was the only significant factor in predicting the degree of leukopenia/neutropenia, and increasing age was also associated with decreasing drug clearance and an increase in drug AUC. A small dose reduction and/or careful monitoring is required in this patient group. Further studies are required to elucidate further the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of etoposide and its pharmacodynamics, particularly with regard to anti-tumor activity, and to determine the role of individualised therapy, based on a pharmacokinetic parameter, in reducing the dynamic variability and optimising the use of this drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8070031     DOI: 10.1007/bf00684867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  15 in total

1.  Changes in the clearance of total and unbound etoposide in patients with liver dysfunction.

Authors:  C F Stewart; S G Arbuck; R A Fleming; W E Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Pharmacologically based dosing of etoposide: a means of safely increasing dose intensity.

Authors:  M J Ratain; R Mick; R L Schilsky; N J Vogelzang; F Berezin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Etoposide in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

Authors:  N Niederle; J Ostermann; W Achterrath; L Lenaz; C G Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion etoposide.

Authors:  A A Miller; C F Stewart; E A Tolley
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Randomized dose-response evaluation of etoposide in small cell carcinoma of the lung: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial.

Authors:  S N Wolff; R Birch; P Sarma; F A Greco
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-05

6.  Chronic daily administration of oral etoposide--a phase I trial.

Authors:  J D Hainsworth; D H Johnson; S R Frazier; F A Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  VP16-213 (etoposide). A critical review of its activity.

Authors:  F Cavalli
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  A comparative assessment of the in vitro effects of drugs on cells by means of colony assays or flow microfluorimetry.

Authors:  B T Hill; R D Whelan; H T Rupniak; L Y Dennis; M A Rosholt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M L Slevin; P I Clark; S P Joel; S Malik; R J Osborne; W M Gregory; D G Lowe; R H Reznek; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of 72-hour continuous infusion of etoposide in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  C L Bennett; J A Sinkule; R L Schilsky; E Senekjian; K E Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  14 in total

1.  Topoisomerase II-mediated alterations of K562 drug resistant sublines.

Authors:  R Zhou; Y Wang; A Gruber; R Larsson; E Castaños-Vèlez; E Liliemark
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Martin S Highley; Ernst A de Bruijn; Allan T van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  An interface model for dosage adjustment connects hematotoxicity to pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  C Meille; A Iliadis; D Barbolosi; N Frances; G Freyer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  Etoposide-loaded immunoliposomes as active targeting agents for GD2-positive malignancies.

Authors:  Brandon S Brown; Tariq Patanam; Keyan Mobli; Christian Celia; Peter E Zage; Andrew J Bean; Ennio Tasciotti
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 5.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Protective effects of propolis and related polyphenolic/flavonoid compounds against toxicity induced by irinotecan.

Authors:  Nada Oršolić; Vesna Benković; Duje Lisičić; Domagoj Dikić; Julija Erhardt; Anica Horvat Knežević
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  The amount of cytokine-release defines different shades of Sars-Cov2 infection.

Authors:  S Bindoli; M Felicetti; P Sfriso; A Doria
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-05-28

8.  Phase I escalation of gemcitabine combined with protracted oral etoposide in gynecologic malignancies: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Agustin A Garcia; Michael A Bookman; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez; David G Mutch; Katherine Y Look
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 9.  Drug administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Minimising renal and extrarenal toxicity.

Authors:  G R Matzke; R F Frye
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.

Authors:  Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.