Literature DB >> 2155063

Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous-infusion etoposide.

A A Miller1, C F Stewart, E A Tolley.   

Abstract

Continuous-infusion etoposide was given to 15 patients with newly diagnosed small-cell lung cancer (extensive disease) and 10 patients with various refractory malignancies. The untreated patients with lung cancer received 200 mg/m2 etoposide over 24 h in combination with 100 mg/m2 cisplatin, and the pretreated patients received 400 mg/m2 etoposide over 36 h as monotherapy. Pharmacokinetic studies of etoposide were carried out in all patients. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to measure etoposide. All patients had normal hepatic and renal function tests and were followed weekly for hematologic toxicity after therapy. In all, 14 untreated and 9 pretreated patients were evaluable. Biostatistical analysis was done to correlate pharmacokinetic results to hematologic effects. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for continuous variables (i.e., blood counts), and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for ranked variables (i.e., toxicity grades). The values for the area under the plasma concentration vs time curve (AUC) and systemic clearance varied widely among patients. However, the AUC and clearance were significantly correlated (P less than 0.05) with the WBC and platelet nadirs and the decrease in hemoglobin. The grade of leukopenia and total grade of hematologic toxicity were also correlated with AUC and clearance. Because the interpatient variability in etoposide pharmacokinetics correlates with the variable degree of hematologic toxicity, pharmacokinetic drug monitoring is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2155063     DOI: 10.1007/BF00686238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  8 in total

1.  Adaptive control of etoposide administration: impact of interpatient pharmacodynamic variability.

Authors:  M J Ratain; R L Schilsky; K E Choi; C Guarnieri; D Grimmer; N J Vogelzang; E Senekjian; M A Liebner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Schedule dependency of the antileukemic activity of the podophyllotoxin-derivative VP 16-213 (NSC-141540) in L1210 leukemia.

Authors:  P Dombernowsky; N I Nissen
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A       Date:  1973-09

3.  A comparison of numerical integrating algorithms by trapezoidal, Lagrange, and spline approximation.

Authors:  K C Yeh; K C Kwan
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-02

4.  Survival and cycle-progression delay of human lymphoma cells in vitro exposed to VP-16-213.

Authors:  B Drewinko; B Barlogie
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-09

5.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial.

Authors:  J H Rodman; M Abromowitch; J A Sinkule; F A Hayes; G K Rivera; W E Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of 72-hour continuous infusion of etoposide in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  C L Bennett; J A Sinkule; R L Schilsky; E Senekjian; K E Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of VP-16-213 and implications for chemotherapy.

Authors:  S N Wolff; W W Grosh; K Prater; K R Hande
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Etoposide: an update.

Authors:  R A Fleming; A A Miller; C F Stewart
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1989-04
  8 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  A limited sampling method for estimation of the etoposide area under the curve.

Authors:  A S Strömgren; B T Sørensen; P Jakobsen; A Jakobsen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Phase I study of valspodar (PSC-833) with mitoxantrone and etoposide in refractory and relapsed pediatric acute leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Maureen M O'Brien; Norman J Lacayo; Bert L Lum; Smita Kshirsagar; Steven Buck; Yaddanapudi Ravindranath; Mark Bernstein; Howard Weinstein; Myron N Chang; Robert J Arceci; Branimir I Sikic; Gary V Dahl
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Bioequivalence assessment of etoposide phosphate and etoposide using pharmacodynamic and traditional pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  V Mummaneni; S Kaul; L N Igwemezie; D R Newell; D Porter; H Thomas; A H Calvert; B Winograd; R H Barbhaiya
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-08

Review 5.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  How important is therapeutic drug monitoring in the prediction and avoidance of adverse reactions?

Authors:  C A Gentry; K A Rodvold
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Pharmacodynamics of three daily infusions of etoposide in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A A Miller; E A Tolley; H B Niell; C F Stewart; J P Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.