Literature DB >> 2549204

A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

M L Slevin1, P I Clark, S P Joel, S Malik, R J Osborne, W M Gregory, D G Lowe, R H Reznek, P F Wrigley.   

Abstract

Etoposide is an increasingly used and well-tolerated drug in cancer medicine. Its cytotoxic action is phase-specific and it has demonstrated schedule dependency in both in vitro and animal studies, but clinical evidence of the importance of drug scheduling is uncertain. The two administration schedules of etoposide that have been compared in this randomized study of 39 patients with previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer treated with single-agent etoposide were 500 mg/m2 as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 24 hours or five consecutive daily 2-hour infusions each of 100 mg/m2. Both regimens were repeated every 3 weeks, for a maximum of six cycles. Patients received combination chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or radiotherapy on failure to respond or at relapse, depending on their Karnofsky performance status. The same therapy was used in both arms of the study. All patients are evaluable for response to etoposide. In the 24-hour arm, two patients achieved a partial remission, resulting in an overall response rate of 10%. In the 5-day schedule, 16 patients had a partial response and one had a complete remission, producing an overall response rate of 89%, which was significantly superior to that in the 24-hour arm (P less than .001). The median duration of remission to etoposide in the 5-day arm was 4.5 months. Bone marrow toxicity was similar in both schedules. Etoposide pharmacokinetics were measured in all patients, and total areas under the concentration versus time curves (AUCs) were equivalent in both regimens. This study has clearly demonstrated the importance of etoposide scheduling in humans, and the superiority of five daily infusions over a 24-hour continuous infusion. The response rate to single-agent etoposide using an efficacious schedule in extensive small-cell lung cancer has been determined to be in excess of 80%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2549204     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.9.1333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  80 in total

1.  Intra-arterial cisplatin plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a phase II study.

Authors:  L S Ashby; W R Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Etoposide phosphate, the water soluble prodrug of etoposide.

Authors:  A H Witterland; C H Koks; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1996-10

Review 3.  Effects of food on the clinical pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents: underlying mechanisms and implications for oral chemotherapy.

Authors:  Brahma N Singh; Bimal K Malhotra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Mitomycin C, teniposide, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  G Giaccone; V Iberti; M Donadio; F Testore
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Etoposide in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I study.

Authors:  N Niederle; J Ostermann; W Achterrath; L Lenaz; C G Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Unaltered pharmacokinetics after the administration of high-dose etoposide without prior dilution.

Authors:  G Ehninger; B Proksch; H Schmidt; P Waidelich; B Eichel; R Dopfer
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Modified one-day etoposide and cisplatin combination for previously untreated extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective evaluation of 36 cases.

Authors:  Su-Hee Cho; Hyun Kuk Kim; Hang Jea Jang; Min Jae Park
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-29

8.  Second-line chemotherapy with long-term low-dose oral etoposide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  M Bontenbal; A S Planting; J Verweij; R de Wit; W H Kruit; G Stoter; J G Klijn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Prolonged daily administration of oral etoposide in lymphoma following prior therapy with adriamycin, an ifosfamide-containing salvage combination, and intravenous etoposide.

Authors:  N Haim; M Ben-Shahar; R Epelbaum
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Therapeutic efficacy of ABT-737, a selective inhibitor of BCL-2, in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christine L Hann; Vincent C Daniel; Elizabeth A Sugar; Irina Dobromilskaya; Sara C Murphy; Leslie Cope; Xue Lin; Jared S Hierman; Daniel L Wilburn; D Neil Watkins; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.