Literature DB >> 2072147

Pharmacologically based dosing of etoposide: a means of safely increasing dose intensity.

M J Ratain1, R Mick, R L Schilsky, N J Vogelzang, F Berezin.   

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that individualized dosing of etoposide (VP16) by 72-hour infusion is feasible and that the extent of leukopenia is a function of plasma concentration, pretreatment WBC (WBCp), albumin (ALB), performance status (PS), and bone marrow function (based on transfusion requirements). In the current study, 45 patients were randomized between a fixed dose of VP16 (125 mg/m2/d) versus individualized dosing to a target WBC nadir (WBCN) of 1,700/microL. The total dose was increased by an average of 22% in the latter patients (459 +/- 130 mg/m2 v 375 mg/m2, P = .002). This was associated with a decrease in both the mean WBCN (1,510 +/- 950 v 2,500 +/- 1,420/microL, P = .013) and in the variability of the WBCN (P = .039). The VP16 clearance (mL/min) was not correlated with body surface area. Partial responses were observed in one patient each with hepatoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. We conclude that pharmacologically based dosing may be a means of increasing dose intensity without increasing the incidence of life-threatening toxicity due to a decrease in variability around a target WBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2072147     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.8.1480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  22 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  M Sawyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  Individualised cancer chemotherapy: strategies and performance of prospective studies on therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adaptation: a review.

Authors:  Milly E de Jonge; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H M Schellens; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  The average body surface area of adult cancer patients in the UK: a multicentre retrospective study.

Authors:  Joseph J Sacco; Joanne Botten; Fergus Macbeth; Adrian Bagust; Peter Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Pharmacodynamics of three daily infusions of etoposide in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A A Miller; E A Tolley; H B Niell; C F Stewart; J P Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Etoposide Free Concentrations in Solid Tumor.

Authors:  Maiara Cássia Pigatto; Bibiana Verlindo de Araujo; Bruna Gaelzer Silva Torres; Stephan Schmidt; Paolo Magni; Teresa Dalla Costa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Prediction of response to drug therapy of cancer. A review of in vitro assays.

Authors:  W T Bellamy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.