Literature DB >> 12448655

Phase I escalation of gemcitabine combined with protracted oral etoposide in gynecologic malignancies: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Agustin A Garcia1, Michael A Bookman, Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez, David G Mutch, Katherine Y Look.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although improvements have been made in the management of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, long-term survivors are still uncommon. Gemcitabine and prolonged oral etoposide have shown reproducible single-agent activity in patients with platinum/paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. This, combined with preclinical synergism, prompted the Gynecologic Oncology Group to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination.
METHODS: Eligible patients had recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, primary papillary peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma. All had received prior platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and had adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Oral etoposide was administered at 50 mg/m2 for ten days, with three proposed dose levels for gemcitabine on days 1 and 8: 400, 550 and 700 mg/m2. Cycles were to be repeated every 28 days. Three patients were to enter at each dose level.
RESULTS: Patients were enrolled only to dose level 1 as this dose exceeded MTD. Of six patients initially enrolled, one was removed after three days with fever, ascites and decreased albumin believed not to be treatment related. Five patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. One of the first three patients developed dose limiting toxicity (DLT) manifested as grade 4 neutropenia. A second DLT (neutropenic fever and thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding) occurred among the next three patients: therefore, MTD was reached at dose level 1. Grade 4 toxicities included episodes of neutropenia (4) and thrombocytopenia (3). No objective response was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral etoposide and gemcitabine at this dose and schedule was associated with substantial toxicity in this population. Patients who are previously treated with platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy may be at particular risk for toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12448655     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020633300898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  17 in total

1.  A phase II study of gemcitabine plus oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  T S Mok; B Zee; A T Chan; W Yeo; W T Yang; A Yim; S F Leung; B Nguyen; T W Leung; P Johnson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Activity of gemcitabine in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: responses seen following platinum and paclitaxel.

Authors:  J D Shapiro; M J Millward; D Rischin; M Michael; V Walcher; P A Francis; G C Toner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Action of 2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine on DNA synthesis.

Authors:  P Huang; S Chubb; L W Hertel; G B Grindey; W Plunkett
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A N Gordon; C O Granai; P G Rose; J Hainsworth; A Lopez; C Weissman; R Rosales; T Sharpington
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Oral etoposide is active against platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  P J Hoskins; K D Swenerton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Low-dose oral etoposide in epithelial cancer of the ovary.

Authors:  M Marzola; M Zucchetti; N Colombo; C Sessa; O Pagani; M D'Incalci; F Cavalli; C Mangioni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Topotecan for the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an open-label phase II study in patients treated after prior chemotherapy that contained cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Authors:  M A Bookman; H Malmström; G Bolis; A Gordon; A Lissoni; J B Krebs; S Z Fields
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Pharmacokinetics of etoposide: correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters with clinical conditions.

Authors:  K H Pflüger; M Hahn; J B Holz; L Schmidt; P Köhl; H W Fritsch; H Jungclas; K Havemann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer.

Authors:  W P McGuire; W J Hoskins; M F Brady; P R Kucera; E E Partridge; K Y Look; D L Clarke-Pearson; M Davidson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  In vitro cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity in seven resistant small-cell lung cancer cell lines: preclinical identification of suitable drug partners to taxotere, taxol, topotecan and gemcitabin.

Authors:  P B Jensen; B Holm; M Sorensen; I J Christensen; M Sehested
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.