Literature DB >> 3011257

Randomized dose-response evaluation of etoposide in small cell carcinoma of the lung: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group Trial.

S N Wolff, R Birch, P Sarma, F A Greco.   

Abstract

To evaluate postulated dose-response relationships of etoposide (VP-16) for patients with recurrent small cell carcinoma of the lung, a prospectively randomized study was undertaken. VP-16 was administered iv at three dose levels: 300, 600, and 900 mg/m2. Based on historical information, a 20% response rate was anticipated in the standard-dose level and the study was designed to be able to detect a response rate of 40% in either of the high-dose levels. The planned number of patients required in each arm was 45, with an alpha-level of 0.1 and a beta-level of 0.2. The total number of patients actually entered was less than the planned number due to a low response rate. Seventy-seven of 79 treated patients were eligible, and 26, 27, and 26 patients were treated at each dose level, respectively. Toxicity was predominantly hematologic, with the higher dose levels substantially more toxic. Response to therapy was infrequent, with only four partial responses achieved and distributed between all dose levels. In this study, using previously treated patients, VP-16 at standard-dose or at moderate-dose increments had minimal activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3011257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  7 in total

1.  High-dose etoposide: from phase I to a component of curative therapy.

Authors:  Steven N Wolff; John D Hainsworth; F Anthony Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Dose intensity in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  D J Dodwell; H Gurney; N Thatcher
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Relapsed small cell lung cancer: treatment options and latest developments.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Asai; Yoshihiro Ohkuni; Norihiro Kaneko; Etsuro Yamaguchi; Akihito Kubo
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of VP-16-213 and implications for chemotherapy.

Authors:  S N Wolff; W W Grosh; K Prater; K R Hande
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Etoposide dosage and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  S P Joel; R Shah; M L Slevin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Prolonged administration of low-daily-dose etoposide: a superior dosing schedule?

Authors:  F A Greco; J D Hainsworth
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Review of the management of relapsed small-cell lung cancer with amrubicin hydrochloride.

Authors:  Tatsuo Kimura; Shinzoh Kudoh; Kazuto Hirata
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2011-03-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.