Literature DB >> 2230875

Changes in the clearance of total and unbound etoposide in patients with liver dysfunction.

C F Stewart1, S G Arbuck, R A Fleming, W E Evans.   

Abstract

The disposition of total and non-protein-bound etoposide was investigated in 21 cancer patients receiving etoposide and cisplatin combination chemotherapy. Etoposide plasma concentrations were determined using a specific high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and etoposide plasma protein binding was determined by equilibrium dialysis. The patients had a wide range of renal function (creatinine clearance, 32 to 159 mL/min/m2) and hepatic function (total bilirubin range, 0.3 to 21.5 mg/dL; aspartate aminotransferase [AST] range, 14 to 415 IU/L; serum albumin range, 2.7 to 4.1 g/dL). The mean etoposide total systemic clearance was not different in 15 patients with total bilirubin less than 1.0 mg/dL versus six patients with total bilirubin 1.1 to 21.5 mg/dL (18.7 +/- 5.9 mL/min/m2 v 26.4 +/- 10.7 mL/min/m2; t-test P = .06), with a trend toward higher total clearance in the patients with abnormal bilirubin values. However, the mean clearance of unbound etoposide was significantly lower in patients with increased total bilirubin (220 +/- 90 mL/min/m2 v 135 +/- 61 mL/min/m2; t-test P = .027). The fraction of etoposide unbound (fu) in plasma was significantly higher in patients with increased bilirubin (9% +/- 3% v 27% +/- 15%; t-test P = .002), explaining the trend toward higher total clearance in these patients. Etoposide clearance (total or unbound) in the 14 patients with measurable hepatic metastases was not different from the clearance in the seven patients without hepatic metastases. This study provides an explanation for why patients with increased bilirubin do not have lower total systemic clearance of etoposide, and indicates that such patients have a higher exposure to unbound etoposide. The results of ongoing pharmacodynamic studies of total and unbound etoposide in patients with increased bilirubin will determine the clinical relevance of altered etoposide protein binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2230875     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.11.1874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  17 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of anticancer drugs in the elderly population.

Authors:  Hans Wildiers; Martin S Highley; Ernst A de Bruijn; Allan T van Oosterom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral etoposide.

Authors:  G Toffoli; G Corona; R Sorio; I Robieux; B Basso; A M Colussi; M Boiocchi
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Translational studies of phenotypic probes for the mononuclear phagocyte system and liposomal pharmacology.

Authors:  Whitney P Caron; John C Lay; Alan M Fong; Ninh M La-Beck; Parag Kumar; Suzanne E Newman; Haibo Zhou; Jane H Monaco; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Wendy R Brewster; Linda Van Le; Victoria L Bae-Jump; Paola A Gehrig; William C Zamboni
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Disposition of total and unbound etoposide following high-dose therapy.

Authors:  T L Schwinghammer; R A Fleming; C S Rosenfeld; D Przepiorka; R K Shadduck; E J Bloom; C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Pharmacodynamics of three daily infusions of etoposide in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A A Miller; E A Tolley; H B Niell; C F Stewart; J P Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of anticancer therapy.

Authors:  J Liliemark; C Peterson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Chatelut; S Guichard
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Benefits of pharmacological knowledge in the design and monitoring of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Gamelin; G Vassal; J Robert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 10.  Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.

Authors:  Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.