Literature DB >> 8056073

The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics.

R J Bootsma1, R G Marteniuk, C L MacKenzie, F T Zaal.   

Abstract

Earlier studies have suggested that the size of an object to be grasped influences the time taken to complete a prehensile movement. However, the use of cylindrical objects in those studies confounded the effects of object size-extent orthogonal to the reach axis-and object width-extent along the reach axis. In separating these effects, the present study demonstrates that movement time is not affected by manipulation of object size, as long as the latter does not approach the maximal object size that can be grasped. Object width, on the other hand, is shown to exert a systematic influence on movement time: Smaller object widths give rise to longer movement times through a lengthening of the deceleration phase of the movement, thus reproducing the effect of target width on the kinematics of aiming movements. As in aiming, movement amplitude also affects the movement time in prehension, influencing primarily the acceleration phase (i.e. peak velocity attained). The effects of object width and movement amplitude were found to combine in a way predicted by Fitts' law, allowing a generalisation of the latter to the transport component in prehensile actions. With respect to the grasp component, both object size and object width are shown to affect peak hand aperture. Increasing object width thus lowers the spatial accuracy demands on the transport component, permitting a faster movement to emerge. At the same time, the hand opens to a larger grip in order to compensate for eventual directional errors that result.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8056073     DOI: 10.1007/bf00233990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES.

Authors:  P M FITTS; J R PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-02

2.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Movement time in an underwater environment.

Authors:  R Kerr
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

6.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R A Abrams; S Kornblum; C E Wright; J E Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements.

Authors:  S Chieffi; M Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Decision time and movement time as a function of response complexity in retarded persons.

Authors:  M G Wade; K M Newell; S A Wallace
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1978-09

9.  Schemas for the temporal organization of behaviour.

Authors:  M A Arbib
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

10.  Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements.

Authors:  D E Meyer; J E Smith; C E Wright
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  64 in total

1.  The influence of obstacles on the speed of grasping.

Authors:  Marianne Biegstraaten; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Validity of the speed-accuracy tradeoff for prehension movements.

Authors:  M Girgenrath; O Bock; S Jüngling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the parietal operculum disrupts haptic memory for grasping.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Francesca Maule; Davide Tabarelli; Thomas Brochier; Guido Barchiesi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Knowing your nose better than your thumb: measures of over-grasp reveal that face-parts are special for grasping.

Authors:  M G Edwards; A M Wing; J Stevens; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Alexandra Grosskopf; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Movement kinematics in prehension are affected by grasping objects of different mass.

Authors:  Daniel Eastough; Martin G Edwards
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Trunk recruitment during spoon use in tetraparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Dominique van Roon; Bert Steenbergen; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  To throw or to place: does onward intention affect how a child reaches for an object?

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Maia Byrne; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Joystick control for powered mobility: current state of technology and future directions.

Authors:  Brad E Dicianno; Rory A Cooper; John Coltellaro
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.