Literature DB >> 15480598

Knowing your nose better than your thumb: measures of over-grasp reveal that face-parts are special for grasping.

M G Edwards1, A M Wing, J Stevens, G W Humphreys.   

Abstract

Typically, when a grasping response is made, the hand opens wider than the target object. We show that this "over-grasp" response is reduced when we reach to parts of our own face, relative to when we reach to other body parts or to neutral objects. This is not due to reaching to different parts of body space, as over-grasp responses are indifferent to whether or not other body parts or neutral objects are placed close to the face. It is also not due to differences in perceptual knowledge of the size of the target object. We conclude instead that the familiarity of face parts influences the grasping response directly. Subsequent experiments demonstrate that the movement representation determining any effect is not based on a torso-centred frame, and not abstracted from the specific hand used for grasping. We discuss the implications of the results for understanding and measuring motor representations for familiar actions.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480598     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2047-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Object motor representation and reaching-grasping control.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Object familiarity affects finger shaping during grasping of fruit stalks.

Authors:  Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  The timing of natural prehension movements.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Action-based mechanisms of attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; L A Howard; G Houghton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effects of object size and distance.

Authors:  N Kudoh; M Hattori; N Numata; K Maruyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics.

Authors:  R J Bootsma; R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; F T Zaal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion.

Authors:  M Jeannerod; J Decety; F Michel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.139

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition.

Authors:  Sarah J Casey; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Nonvisual learning of intrinsic object properties in a reaching task dissociates grasp from reach.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Leandra R Schneider; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reach and Grasp reconfigurations reveal that proprioception assists reaching and hapsis assists grasping in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Lauren A Hall; Jenni M Karl; Brittany L Thomas; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Different evolutionary origins for the reach and the grasp: an explanation for dual visuomotor channels in primate parietofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Direct comparisons of hand and mouth kinematics during grasping, feeding and fork-feeding actions.

Authors:  D J Quinlan; J C Culham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.