Literature DB >> 23455727

To throw or to place: does onward intention affect how a child reaches for an object?

Kate Wilmut1, Maia Byrne, Anna L Barnett.   

Abstract

Picking up an object is a seemingly simple and isolated task; however, research has demonstrated that adults plan a reach-to-grasp movement on the basis of forthcoming actions. For example a greater deceleration period is seen in an initial reach movement which precedes a place movement compared to a throw movement. This task-specific or second-order motor planning is also seen in infants and toddlers; however, the developmental progression is unclear. Reach-to-grasp movements of 48 children, split into four age groups (4-5, 6-7, 8-9 and 10-11 years) were recorded. These movements preceded a tight place, a loose place or a throw action. All the children showed some degree of tailoring kinematics to the onward action. In the 4-5 year-old group, this was demonstrated by a longer movement duration in the place actions compared to the throw action. In the older children the proportion of time spent decelerating increased as the precision requirements of the task increased. These results demonstrate that all children are able to use second-order planning to integrate onward task demands into their movements. The capacity for this increases with age but is not fully mature at 11 years. These developmental effects may be explained by the relative weighting of costs involved in tailoring a reach action compared to the benefits of producing a more efficient onward action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23455727     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3453-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Problem solving in infancy: the emergence of an action plan.

Authors:  M E McCarty; R K Clifton; R R Collard
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

3.  Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.

Authors:  Ty W Boyer; Matthew R Longo; Bennett I Bertenthal
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-02-09

4.  Development of prehension movements in children: a kinematic study.

Authors:  J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; H Stolze; K Jöhnk; A Boczek-Funcke; M Illert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

6.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements.

Authors:  C G Atkeson; J M Hollerbach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The development toward stereotypic arm kinematics during reaching in the first 3 years of life.

Authors:  J Konczak; J Dichgans
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Assessment of neuropsychological function through use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery: performance in 4- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Monica Luciana; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement?

Authors:  Claudia Armbrüster; Will Spijkers
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.422

View more
  8 in total

1.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Motor Intention/Intentionality and Associationism - A conceptual review.

Authors:  Denis Ebbesen; Jeppe Olsen
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2018-12

3.  Role of the cerebellum in high stages of motor planning hierarchy.

Authors:  Luca Casartelli; Alessandra Federici; Ambra Cesareo; Emilia Biffi; Giulia Valtorta; Massimo Molteni; Luca Ronconi; Renato Borgatti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Performance of Motor Sequences in Children at Heightened vs. Low Risk for ASD: A Longitudinal Study from 18 to 36 Months of Age.

Authors:  Valentina Focaroli; Fabrizio Taffoni; Shelby M Parsons; Flavio Keller; Jana M Iverson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-13

5.  Feasibility of Motor Imagery Training for Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder - A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Imke L J Adams; Bouwien Smits-Engelsman; Jessica M Lust; Peter H Wilson; Bert Steenbergen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-26

6.  Motor performance in a shape sorter task: A longitudinal study from 14 to 36 months of age in children with an older sibling ASD.

Authors:  Fabrizio Taffoni; Valentina Focaroli; Flavio Keller; Jana Marie Iverson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Kinematic characteristics of second-order motor planning and performance in 6- and 10-year-old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints.

Authors:  Erik Domellöf; Anna Bäckström; Anna-Maria Johansson; Louise Rönnqvist; Claes von Hofsten; Kerstin Rosander
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  A wearable ring-shaped inertial system to identify action planning impairments during reach-to-grasp sequences: a pilot study.

Authors:  Erika Rovini; Guenda Galperti; Valeria Manera; Gianmaria Mancioppi; Laura Fiorini; Auriane Gros; Philippe Robert; Filippo Cavallo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.