Literature DB >> 16323004

Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Dean R Melmoth1, Simon Grant.   

Abstract

Theoretical considerations suggest that binocular information should provide advantages, compared to monocular viewing, for the planning and execution of natural reaching and grasping actions, but empirical support for this is quite equivocal. We have examined these predictions on a simple prehension task in which normal subjects reached, grasped and lifted isolated cylindrical household objects (two sizes, four locations) in a well-lit environment, using binocular vision or with one eye occluded. Various kinematic measures reflecting the programming and on-line control of the movements were quantified, in combination with analyses of different types of error occurring in the velocity, spatial path and grip aperture profiles of each trial. There was little consistent effect of viewing condition on the early phase of the reach, up to and including the peak deceleration, but all other aspects of performance were superior under binocular control. Subjects adopted a cautious approach when binocular information was unavailable: they extended the end phase of the reach and pre-shaped their hand with a wider grip aperture further away from the object. Despite these precautions, initial grip application was poorly coordinated with target contact and was inaccurately scaled to the objects' dimensions, with the subsequent post-contact phase of the grasp significantly more prolonged, error-prone and variable compared to binocular performance. These effects were obtained in two separate experiments in which the participants' performed the task under randomized or more predictable (blocked) viewing conditions. Our data suggest that binocular vision offers particular advantages for controlling the terminal reach and the grasp. We argue that these benefits derive from binocular disparity processing linked to changes in relative hand-target distance, and that this depth information is independently used to regulate the progress of the approaching hand and to guide the digits to the (pre-selected) contact points on the object, thereby ensuring that the grip is securely applied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16323004     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0273-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  53 in total

1.  Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems.

Authors:  P Servos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of familiar size in the control of grasping.

Authors:  J J Marotta; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension.

Authors:  A Churchill; B Hopkins; L Rönnqvist; S Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Topology of Limb Deceleration in Prehension Tasks.

Authors:  F. T. J. M. Zaal; R. J. Bootsma
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.

Authors:  N. E. Berthier; R. K. Clifton; V. Gullapalli; D. D. McCall; D. J. Robin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces.

Authors:  P Jenmalm; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study.

Authors:  F Binkofski; C Dohle; S Posse; K M Stephan; H Hefter; R J Seitz; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.

Authors:  P Servos; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale; Nicole Mendarozqueta; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  55 in total

1.  Importance of binocular vision in foot placement accuracy when stepping onto a floor-based target during gait initiation.

Authors:  Graham J Chapman; Andy Scally; John G Buckley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Locomoting-to-reach: information variables and control strategies for nested actions.

Authors:  Joe Anderson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Large perspective changes yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp and it persists after the optic flow has stopped!

Authors:  Young-Lim Lee; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Anterior regions of monkey parietal cortex process visual 3D shape.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Durand; Koen Nelissen; Olivier Joly; Claire Wardak; James T Todd; J Farley Norman; Peter Janssen; Wim Vanduffel; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Cerebellar inputs to intraparietal cortex areas LIP and MIP: functional frameworks for adaptive control of eye movements, reaching, and arm/eye/head movement coordination.

Authors:  Vincent Prevosto; Werner Graf; Gabriella Ugolini
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The role of binocular vision in grasping: a small stimulus-set distorts results.

Authors:  Bruce D Keefe; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The role of stereopsis (three-dimensional vision) in dentistry: review of the current literature.

Authors:  M Syrimi; N Ali
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The Poggendorff illusion affects manual pointing as well as perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.