Literature DB >> 12677335

The influence of obstacles on the speed of grasping.

Marianne Biegstraaten1, Jeroen B J Smeets, Eli Brenner.   

Abstract

The movement time of a reach-to-grasp movement increases when obstacles are placed close to the target object. We investigated whether this increase can best be explained by limits on the grip aperture or by limits on the paths of the individual digits. In our experiment subjects were instructed to pick up an object with their index finger and thumb. There was an obstacle at either side of the object. The increase in movement time when either obstacle was placed closer to the object was best described by a model in which the movement amplitude and the distance between each obstacle and the target object are independent factors. We conclude that the way that obstacles influence the movement time in reach-to-grasp movements is determined by the extent to which they limit the digits' paths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12677335     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1374-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements.

Authors:  R Plamondon; A M Alimi
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  A test between two hypotheses and a possible third way for the control of prehension.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; R D McIntosh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Independent movements of the digits in grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES.

Authors:  P M FITTS; J R PETERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-02

6.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; M Jeannerod; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age.

Authors:  A T Welford; A H Norris; N W Shock
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1969

8.  Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics.

Authors:  S R Jackson; G M Jackson; J Rosicky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics.

Authors:  R J Bootsma; R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; F T Zaal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension.

Authors:  J R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  10 in total

1.  Chronostasis without voluntary action.

Authors:  Iona Alexander; Kai V Thilo; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.

Authors:  R Gilster; J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; C D Wiesner; R Ferstl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Distractor objects affect fingers' angular distances but not fingers' shaping during grasping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Veronica Tognin; Luca Turella; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Why does an obstacle just below the digits' paths not influence a grasping movement while an obstacle to the side of their paths does?

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Similarities between digits' movements in grasping, touching and pushing.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Juul Martin; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Avoiding moving obstacles.

Authors:  M Pilar Aivar; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of similarity: non-spatial features modulate obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Rudmer Menger; H Chris Dijkerman; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search.

Authors:  Roshani Gnanaseelan; Dave A Gonzalez; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Having several options does not increase the time it takes to make a movement to an adequate end point.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Integration of egocentric and allocentric information during memory-guided reaching to images of a natural environment.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Christian Wolf; Mathias Klinghammer; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.