Literature DB >> 17072606

Movement kinematics in prehension are affected by grasping objects of different mass.

Daniel Eastough1, Martin G Edwards.   

Abstract

Previous research has identified that prehension is composed of a reach and a grasp component and that the position and size of the object can independently affect each. However, no effects on prior to contact prehension kinematics have been reported for manipulations in object mass. We felt that this 'lack of a finding' was surprising, as a more accurate grip position on heavier objects would prevent slippage and rotation when lifting the object. Therefore, we hypothesized that increased object mass would effect the grasp component movement kinematics prior to contact in preparation for a stable final grip placement on the object. We report two experiments in which participants reached, grasped and lifted objects of various size and mass, and their movement kinematics were recorded using a motion tracking system. The results showed that the mass of the object significantly influenced prior-to-contact grasp kinematics. Both studies showed that the heavy compared to light objects caused increased peak grasp aperture, a final finger and thumb placement on the object that more closely passed through the object centre of mass, increased lift delay and reduced peak lift velocity. The data are discussed in terms of how object mass influences the reach, grasp and lift components of prehensile movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17072606     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0749-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control.

Authors:  D M. Wolpert; R C. Miall
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1996-11

3.  The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension.

Authors:  P L Weir; C L MacKenzie; R G Marteniuk; S L Cargoe; M B Frazer
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  The prehensile movements of the human hand.

Authors:  J R NAPIER
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1956-11

5.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 6.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Effects of surface texture on weight perception when lifting objects with a precision grip.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; A M Wing; S Allison; A Spenceley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

8.  Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry.

Authors:  Susan J Lederman; Alan M Wing
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Adjusting reach to lift movements to sudden visible changes in target's weight.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Ioanna Georgiou; Scott Glover; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  26 in total

1.  Event coding and motor priming: how attentional modulation may influence binding across action properties.

Authors:  Brenda Ocampo; David R Painter; Ada Kritikos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Livia Giosa; Luca Turella; Gianmarco Altoè; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The context dependence of grasping movements: an evaluation of possible reasons.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of task and content on digit placement on a bottle.

Authors:  Céline Crajé; Jamie R Lukos; Caterina Ansuini; Andrew M Gordon; Marco Santello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Probabilistic information on object weight shapes force dynamics in a grip-lift task.

Authors:  Leif Trampenau; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; Thilo van Eimeren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Arran T Reader; Carmel Houston-Price; Andrew J Bremner; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of task complexity on grip-to-load coordination in bimanual actions.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Jay L Alberts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The influence of target object shape on maximum grip aperture in human grasping movements.

Authors:  Rebekka Verheij; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Center or side: biases in selecting grasp points on small bars.

Authors:  Vivian C Paulun; Urs Kleinholdermann; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.