Literature DB >> 7983272

Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees.

C M McKay1, H J McDermott, G M Clark.   

Abstract

The percepts elicited by electrical stimulation of auditory neurons by trains of amplitude-modulated current pulses were studied in a group of six cochlear implant users. Modulation frequencies of 100, 150, and 200 Hz were studied, with a range of carrier rates up to 1200 Hz. It was found that all but one subject could consistently rank 150- and 200-Hz modulated stimuli by modulation frequency when the carrier rate was more than 800 Hz, but for lower carrier rates the ranking was greatly affected by the harmonic relationship between carrier and modulation frequency. Pitch matching experiments showed that the subjects generally considered the modulated stimuli to be equal in pitch to unmodulated stimuli with rates the same as, or somewhat higher than, the modulation frequency. The results showed that the "pitch" of pulsatile electrical stimulation resulting from periodicities in the time structure of the electrical stimulus has similarities to the "pitch" observed for temporal patterns in acoustic stimulation such as amplitude-modulated noise. There were some differences, however, which may be attributable at least in part to the physiological response differences for electric and acoustic stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7983272     DOI: 10.1121/1.411377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Models of brainstem responses to bilateral electrical stimulation.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Yoojin Chung; Yi Zhou; Andrew Brughera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-22

Review 7.  Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

8.  Sequential stream segregation using temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Robert S Hong; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.