Literature DB >> 7813495

Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

B J Thomas1, E J MacLeod, P E Hay, P J Horner, D Taylor-Robinson.   

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are widely used to diagnose chlamydial infections in patients attending genitourinary medicine clinics. They are relatively easy to perform and are suitable for testing large numbers of samples. The objective of this study was to determine what proportion of women with chlamydial infection, defined as the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in a cervical smear or deposit and/or in the urinary tract, detected by means of a sensitive direct fluorescent antibody test could also be identified by using two commercially available EIAs to test cervical samples. On hundred fifty-one women attending the genitourinary medicine clinic at St. Mary's Hospital, London, were enrolled. The use of the Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Diagnostics, UK) and MicroTrak (Syva, UK) EIAs resulted in the identification of only 56% and 63%, respectively, of women with chlamydial infection detected by direct fluorescent antibody staining. Thus, the EIAs available for detection of chlamydiae in cervical samples are inadequate for identifying all infected women. Improvement might be achieved by testing multiple samples or by resorting to tests of greater sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7813495     DOI: 10.1007/bf01973991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  7 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

2.  Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; C A Reichart; J M Long; L E Welsh; T M Neumann; E W Hook; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; D A Hawkins; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Improved sensitivity of an enzyme immunoassay IDEIA for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B J Thomas; M F Osborn; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; P J Horner; E MacLeod; A M Renton; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-04

Review 6.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence improved by centrifugation of specimens.

Authors:  B Thomas; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.267

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassay antigen detection, nucleic acid hybridization and PCR assay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  A Miettinen; P Vuorinen; T Varis; O Hällström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J K Møller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Genital Chlamydia trachomatis: an update.

Authors:  Meenakshi Malhotra; Seema Sood; Anjan Mukherjee; Sumathi Muralidhar; Manju Bala
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.