Literature DB >> 2199517

Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.

C A Gaydos1, C A Reichart, J M Long, L E Welsh, T M Neumann, E W Hook, T C Quinn.   

Abstract

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection was evaluated by culture and a new Syva enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 1,012 patients at two Baltimore, Md., sexually transmitted disease clinics. The overall chlamydia prevalence determined by culture was 12%. For 506 fresh cervical and urethral specimens, the sensitivity of Syva EIA was 90% and its specificity was 94% compared with culture. Discordant Syva EIA results were further evaluated by staining the sediment in centrifuged culture transport media and Syva EIA transport tubes with a fluorescent monoclonal antibody to C. trachomatis to detect elementary bodies. Reanalysis of the data after use of this technique to resolve discordant results increased sensitivity and specificity to 92 and 96%, respectively. A subsample of 307 fresh cervical specimens was also tested in a three-way comparison using Abbott Chlamydiazyme, Syva EIA, and culture. In this sample, compared with culture, the sensitivity and specificity of Syva EIA were 87 and 95%, respectively, and for Chlamydiazyme they were 77 and 98%, respectively. Syva EIA is a 4-h, easy-to-perform enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay which has a high sensitivity with fresh genital specimens and offers an excellent alternative to culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2199517      PMCID: PMC267985          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1541-1544.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Fifteen-month follow-up study of women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  W M McCormack; S Alpert; D E McComb; R L Nichols; D Z Semine; S H Zinner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Epidemiology of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  S E Thompson; A E Washington
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Chlamydial infections.

Authors:  J Schachter; M Grossman
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 13.739

4.  Molecular techniques for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  E M Peterson; R Oda; R Alexander; J R Greenwood; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L Grillner; S Beckman; H Hammar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  K H Tjiam; B Y van Heijst; A van Zuuren; J H Wagenvoort; T van Joost; E Stolz; M F Michel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Role of Chlamydia trachomatis in perinatal infection.

Authors:  E R Alexander; H R Harrison
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug

Review 8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis proctitis.

Authors:  T C Quinn; S E Goodell; E Mkrtichian; M D Schuffler; S P Wang; W E Stamm; K K Holmes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Assessing the number of genital chlamydial infections in the United States.

Authors:  F N Judson
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 0.142

View more
  17 in total

1.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Use of ligase chain reaction with urine versus cervical culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in an asymptomatic military population of pregnant and nonpregnant females attending Papanicolaou smear clinics.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; M R Howell; T C Quinn; J C Gaydos; K T McKee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassay antigen detection, nucleic acid hybridization and PCR assay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  A Miettinen; P Vuorinen; T Varis; O Hällström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.

Authors:  K Fonseca; D W Megran; C M Anand
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Non-invasive sampling for detection of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in males utilising urinary leukocyte esterase tests and immunoassays.

Authors:  M A Domeika; M Bassiri; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.

Authors:  L M Clarke; M F Sierra; B J Daidone; N Lopez; J M Covino; W M McCormack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Chlamydial cervical infection in jailed women.

Authors:  M D Holmes; S M Safyer; N A Bickell; S H Vermund; P A Hanff; R S Phillips
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Use of multiple nucleic acid amplification tests to define the infected-patient "gold standard" in clinical trials of new diagnostic tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  David H Martin; Malanda Nsuami; Julius Schachter; Edward W Hook; Dennis Ferrero; Thomas C Quinn; Charlotte Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.