Literature DB >> 8993862

Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

C M Black1.   

Abstract

Infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis are probably the most common sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. Commonly unrecognized and often inadequately treated, chlamydial infections can ascend the reproductive tract and cause pelvic inflammatory disease, which often results in the devastating consequences of infertility, ectopic pregnancy, or chronic pelvic pain. C. trachomatis infections are also known to increase the risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection. The obligate intracellular life cycle of C. trachomatis has traditionally required laboratory diagnostic tests that are technically demanding, labor-intensive, expensive, and difficult to access. In spite of these historical challenges, however, laboratory diagnosis of C. trachomatis has been a rapidly advancing area in which there is presently a wide array of commercial diagnostic technologies, costs, manufacturers. This review describes and compares the diagnostic methods for C. trachomatis infection that are currently approved for use in the United States, including the newest DNA amplification technologies which are yet to be licensed for commercial use. Issues to consider in selecting a test for purposes of screening versus diagnosis based on prevalence, performance, legal, social, and cost issues are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8993862      PMCID: PMC172947          DOI: 10.1128/CMR.10.1.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev        ISSN: 0893-8512            Impact factor:   26.132


  208 in total

1.  Closing in on Chlamydia.

Authors:  K Krul
Journal:  CAP Today       Date:  1995-05

Review 2.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  H Weinstock; D Dean; G Bolan
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.982

3.  Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from endocervical and urine specimens in an asymptomatic low-prevalence population of women.

Authors:  M Skulnick; R Chua; A E Simor; D E Low; H E Khosid; S Fraser; E Lyons; E A Legere; D A Kitching
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in male urethral swabs and urines with a microparticle enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; J Sellors; P Coleman; J Bodner; I Hrusovsky; S Chong; J B Mahony
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Comparison of characteristics of Q beta replicase-amplified assay with competitive PCR assay for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Q An; J Liu; W O'Brien; G Radcliffe; D Buxton; S Popoff; W King; M Vera-Garcia; L Lu; J Shah
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of Syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; G Bolan; J Nathan; M A Shafer; A Clark; J Schwebke; W Stamm; T Mroczkowski; Z Seliborska
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.803

7.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; H Lee; J D Burczak; H Hu; J Sellors; S J Tomazic-Allen; J B Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Chlamydial urethritis in heterosexual men attending a genitourinary medicine clinic: prevalence, symptoms, condom usage and partner change.

Authors:  J M Zelin; A J Robinson; G L Ridgway; E Allason-Jones; P Williams
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.359

9.  Novel, ultrasensitive, Q-beta replicase-amplified hybridization assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J S Shah; J Liu; J Smith; S Popoff; G Radcliffe; W J O'Brien; G Serpe; D M Olive; W King
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M Bassiri; H Y Hu; M A Domeika; J Burczak; L O Svensson; H H Lee; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  103 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by ligase chain reaction versus ACCESS Chlamydia antigen assay.

Authors:  K B Waites; K R Smith; M A Crum; R D Hockett; A H Wells; E W Hook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Community development in the new NHS.

Authors:  B Fisher; S Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Screening for genital chlamydial infection: the agenda for general practice.

Authors:  T Stokes; M Santer; J Mears
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Coincubation of human spermatozoa with Chlamydia trachomatis in vitro causes increased tyrosine phosphorylation of sperm proteins.

Authors:  S Hosseinzadeh; I A Brewis; A A Pacey; H D Moore; A Eley
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Pooling cervical swabs and testing by ligase chain reaction are accurate and cost-saving strategies for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Kapala; D Copes; A Sproston; J Patel; D Jang; A Petrich; J Mahony; K Biers; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients.

Authors:  H Sugunendran; H D Birley; H Mallinson; M Abbott; C Y Tong
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Evaluation of laboratory testing methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the era of nucleic acid amplification.

Authors:  T J Battle; M R Golden; K L Suchland; J M Counts; J P Hughes; W E Stamm; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  The acceptability of urinary LCR testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among participants in a probability sample survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles.

Authors:  K A Fenton; A Copas; K Mitchell; G Elam; C Carder; G Ridgway; K Wellings; B Erens; J Field; A M Johnson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 9.  Immunity to murine chlamydial genital infection.

Authors:  Richard P Morrison; Harlan D Caldwell
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Cross-reactivity between Coxiella burnetii and chlamydiae.

Authors:  M Lukácová; J Melnicáková; J Kazár
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.099

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.