Literature DB >> 2071132

Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

D Taylor-Robinson1, B J Thomas.   

Abstract

Yolk-sac inoculation of embryonated eggs was superseded 25 years ago by the use of cell cultures (often McCoy) for the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis. Centrifugation of specimens onto the cell monolayers was shown to increase sensitivity, but little of late has further improved sensitivity which is at least ten-fold greater than that of eggs. However, culture is slow and labour intensive so that non-cultural techniques without these drawbacks have come to dominate. Direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) tests are rapid and have sensitivities that range from 70% to 100% for men and 68% to 100% for women, and specificities that range from 87% to 99% for men and 82% to 100% for women; if the tests are read by competent observers the values are at the top end of the ranges. The detection rate may be enhanced even further by relatively low-speed centrifugation of specimens before staining. Skilled reading is not a feature of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) which according to the literature have sensitivities that range from 62% to 97% for men and 64% to 100% for women, and specificities that range from 92% to 100% for men and 89% to 100% for women. However, comparison against poor reference tests is responsible for most of the higher values and the clinician should not be misled into believing that EIAs have excellent sensitivity; the lower values in the ranges are closer to reality. Furthermore, EIAs that are being designed for use by general practitioners should be regarded with the greatest caution since lack of sensitivity means that chlamydia-positive patients will go undetected. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is not bedevilled by insensitivity but it is no more sensitive than the most sensitive cell culture or DFA tests. PCR is unsuitable for routine diagnosis but has a place as a research tool. For men, examination of "first-catch" urine samples by the best of the non-cultural procedures provides an acceptable non-invasive approach to diagnosis; for women, the value of examining urine may be less, but needs to be thoroughly tested. However, there is little doubt that a Cytobrush used to obtain cervical specimens holds no practical advantage over a swab. Serological tests are reliant on the provision of paired sera for making a diagnosis; high antibody titres in single sera may be suggestive of an aetiological association in deep-seated chlamydial infections (epididymitis, arthritis, salpingitis, etc), but unequivocal interpretation is unusual, particularly in an individual case, since the distinction between a current and past infection is problematical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2071132      PMCID: PMC1194684          DOI: 10.1136/sti.67.3.256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genitourin Med        ISSN: 0266-4348


  141 in total

1.  Enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen in urethral and endocervical swabs.

Authors:  G Mumtaz; B J Mellars; G L Ridgway; J D Oriel
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Evaluation of a genus reactive monoclonal antibody in rapid identification of Chlamydia trachomatis by direct immunofluorescence.

Authors:  I Alexander; I D Paul; E O Caul
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-08

3.  Interference of Staphylococcus aureus in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  T Krech; D Gerhard-Fsadni; N Hofmann; S M Miller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis in smears from eyes, ears, and throats of children with chronic otitis media.

Authors:  J R Banks; G Vanden Driesen; E Stark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-03       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical secretions and serum: effect of blood in such secretions.

Authors:  D W Gump; M Gibson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Comparison of direct immunofluorescence and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S J Foulkes; R Deighton; A R Feeney; K C Mohanty; C W Freeman
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-08

7.  Culture versus direct specimen test: comparative study of infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in Viennese prostitutes.

Authors:  A Stary; W Kopp; W Gebhart; J Söltz-Szöts
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-08

8.  Comparative sensitivity of different serological tests for detecting chlamydial antibodies in perihepatitis.

Authors:  M Puolakkainen; P Saikku; M Leinonen; M Nurminen; P Väänänen; P H Mäkelä
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Triple-culture tests for diagnosis of chlamydial infection of the female genital tract.

Authors:  E M Dunlop; B T Goh; S Darougar; R Woodland
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1985 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Infections with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in women with acute salpingitis.

Authors:  G B Kristensen; A C Bollerup; K Lind; P A Mårdh; P Ladehoff; S Larsen; A Marushak; P Rasmussen; J Rolschau; I Skoven
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1985-06
View more
  33 in total

1.  Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in adolescent men by examination of voided urine.

Authors:  I Mares; O Järnmark; B Kandell; M B Ekegren; L Svensson; B Vilhelmsson; L Forsman
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1992-10

2.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  HLA-B27-associated reactive arthritis: pathogenetic and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Inés Colmegna; Raquel Cuchacovich; Luis R Espinoza
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Genital chlamydial infection among women in Nicaragua: validity of direct fluorescent antibody testing, prevalence, risk factors and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  B Herrmann; F Espinoza; R R Villegas; G D Smith; A Ramos; M Egger
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1996-02

5.  Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  M K Brokenshire; P J Say; A H van Vonno; C Wong
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

6.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydia infections.

Authors:  M Barlow; D T Jayaweera; A A Wade; M Walzman
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-12

7.  Infrequent detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a longitudinal study of women with treated cervical infection.

Authors:  P E Munday; B J Thomas; C B Gilroy; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-02

8.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice urine samples.

Authors:  M S Dryden; M Wilkinson; M Redman; M R Millar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; P J Horner; E MacLeod; A M Renton; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.