Literature DB >> 2668343

Improved sensitivity of an enzyme immunoassay IDEIA for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

B J Thomas1, M F Osborn, C Gilchrist, D Taylor-Robinson.   

Abstract

In tests on 375 genital tract specimens a commercially available enzyme immunoassay for Chlamydia trachomatis (IDEIA; Boots-Celltech) was found to have sensitivity values of 62% for men and 74% for women, and a specificity of 97% for both groups, relative to the results obtained by a fluorescence assay (Micro Trak; Syva). The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value of the immunoassay were 91% and 87%, respectively. Collection of samples for IDEIA in transport medium in plastic phials, as opposed to glass phials recommended by the manufacturer, had no effect on these values. Tests of the sensitivity of IDEIA using laboratory strains of C trachomatis showed that the assay detected chlamydial elementary bodies only at dilutions at least 10-fold lower than those at which they could be detected by Micro Trak. Tests of the specificity of the assay with microorganisms found in the genital tract, other than chlamydiae, showed that reactions occurred with a number of these. Testing three cervical swabs from the same patient, with the material taken into a single phial of transport medium, increased the sensitivity of IDEIA from 74% to 96%, without reducing the specificity which remained at 97%. It is concluded that this approach enchances the value of the test in a sexually transmitted disease clinic population and may do so in a population with a low prevalence of chlamydiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2668343      PMCID: PMC1142030          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.42.7.759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Gerard Slavin: editor, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1978-1988.

Authors:  J S Lilleyman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L V Howard; P F Coleman; B J England; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  K C Mohanty; J J O'Neill; M H Hambling
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1986-06

4.  Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; D A Hawkins; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L Grillner; S Beckman; H Hammar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Authors:  S F Pugh; R C Slack; E O Caul; I D Paul; P N Appleton; S Gatley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme) for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas; M F Osborn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections in urogenital specimens.

Authors:  K H Tjiam; B Y van Heijst; A van Zuuren; J H Wagenvoort; T van Joost; E Stolz; M F Michel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of detection procedures for Chlamydia trachomatis, including enzyme immunoassays, in a mouse model of genital infection.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; M Tuffrey
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.472

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  The value of urine samples from men with non-gonococcal urethritis for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; C Gilchrist; H M Palmer; C B Gilroy; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  M K Brokenshire; P J Say; A H van Vonno; C Wong
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

Review 4.  Current problems in microbiology: 1. Chlamydial infections: which laboratory test?

Authors:  G L Ridgway; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of IDEIA III and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  W D Lebar; H Schubiner; C Jemal; B R Herschman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Detection of amplified Chlamydia trachomatis DNA using a microtiter plate-based enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  J M Ossewaarde; M Rieffe; G J van Doornum; C J Henquet; A M van Loon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; P E Hay; P J Horner; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.