Literature DB >> 7588833

Comparison of enzyme immunoassay antigen detection, nucleic acid hybridization and PCR assay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

A Miettinen1, P Vuorinen, T Varis, O Hällström.   

Abstract

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) antigen detection system (MicroTrak, Syva), nucleic acid hybridization (PACE 2, Gen-Probe) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Amplicor, Hoffmann-La Roche) were evaluated for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a high-risk female population. Of 234 specimens, 42 (18%) were positive. The respective sensitivity of the EIA, RNA hybridization and the PCR was 81, 90 and 88%. When additionally performed on diluted specimens, PCR gave positive results for three of four PCR-negative specimens from EIA- and RNA-hybridization-positive women and a sensitivity of 95%. Thus, both techniques employing gene technology offered a clear improvement in sensitivity over the EIA. Future improvements in the PCR should be directed towards the elimination of polymerase inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7588833     DOI: 10.1007/BF02113438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  11 in total

1.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of Syva enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; C A Reichart; J M Long; L E Welsh; T M Neumann; E W Hook; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.

Authors:  L M Clarke; M F Sierra; B J Daidone; N Lopez; J M Covino; W M McCormack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; J B Mahony; S Castriciano; M Mores; I O Stewart; S J Landis; W Seidelman; E J Sargeant; C Leman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.

Authors:  C A Bass; D L Jungkind; N S Silverman; J M Bondi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; P E Hay; P J Horner; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  J E Bauwens; A M Clark; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 and the Microtrak enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital samples.

Authors:  A Stary; L Teodorowicz; I Hörting-Müller; S Nerad; M Storch
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B Dutilh; C Bébéar; P Rodriguez; A Vekris; J Bonnet; M Garret
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.992

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the PACE 2 assay, two amplification assays, and Clearview EIA for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in female endocervical and urine specimens.

Authors:  T L Lauderdale; L Landers; I Thorneycroft; K Chapin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by nucleic acid tests: comparison with culture and enzyme immunoassay of genital swab specimens.

Authors:  S Schepetiuk; T Kok; L Martin; R Waddell; G Higgins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  RNA amplification by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification with an internal standard enables reliable detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical scrapings and urine samples.

Authors:  S A Morré; P Sillekens; M V Jacobs; P van Aarle; S de Blok; B van Gemen; J M Walboomers; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.

Authors:  J Mahony; S Chong; D Jang; K Luinstra; M Faught; D Dalby; J Sellors; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Polymerase chain reaction assay with urine specimens in the diagnosis of acute chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

Authors:  R Pasternack; A Mustila; P Vuorinen; P K Heinonen; A Miettinen
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.