Literature DB >> 8206484

Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.

P E Hay1, B J Thomas, P J Horner, E MacLeod, A M Renton, D Taylor-Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which testing of multiple sites and samples is required to define whether a woman is Chlamydia trachomatis-positive.
DESIGN: One-hundred and fifty women attending the Genitourinary Medicine clinic at St Mary's Hospital were enrolled; they had not received antichlamydial antibiotics in the previous three months, were not in a high-risk group for HIV infection, or pregnant, or using an intrauterine contraceptive device. Thirty-two women were re-examined three months after recruitment.
METHODS: An urethral specimen was Gram stained (smear) and cultured for gonococci. Another urethral specimen was taken to detect C trachomatis elementary bodies (EBs) by the MicroTrak direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test (Syva). An endocervical swab specimen was Gram stained (smear) and cultured for gonococci. One of two other endocervical swabs was used for the DFA test and was then placed in medium which was centrifuged in a MicroCentaur at 13,000 rpm for 10 min; the deposit was examined by using the DFA test. The first 15-20 ml of voided urine (first pass urine; FPU) was also centrifuged and the deposit tested similarly.
RESULTS: Of 182 cervical smears and/or deposits tested for C trachomatis, 38 were positive; more cervical deposits (37) than smears (26) were positive and, of these, one-fifth of the deposits and one-third of the smears contained fewer than 10 elementary bodies. Of 162 paired urethral smears and FPU deposits available, one or other specimen of 36 pairs was chlamydia-positive, that is 31 smears and 32 deposits; of these, two-fifths of the smears and half of the deposits contained fewer than 10 EBs. Of 150 sets of cervical and urinary tract samples tested, 31 were chlamydia-positive at both sites, six in the cervix alone and four in the urinary tract alone. Of 139 women for whom there were valid first visit sample results, 36 (26%) were chlamydia-positive in the cervix, 34 (25%) in the urinary tract and 41 (29%) had at least one sample from either site positive. Overall, DFA tests of deposits from centrifuged cervical specimens achieved the highest sensitivity (88%) and those of cervical smears the lowest (70%).
CONCLUSIONS: Deposits from centrifuged cervical specimens were C trachomatis-positive more often than were cervical smears. Testing deposits from centrifuged urines was as successful as testing urethral smears. One-fifth (cervical deposits) to one-half (urine deposits) of specimens contained fewer than 10 EBs. The urinary tract was chlamydia-positive almost as frequently as the cervix but both sites needed to be tested to define whether a woman was chlamydia-positive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8206484      PMCID: PMC1195202          DOI: 10.1136/sti.70.2.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genitourin Med        ISSN: 0266-4348


  8 in total

1.  The value of urine samples from men with non-gonococcal urethritis for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; C Gilchrist; H M Palmer; C B Gilroy; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-04

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Chlamydia trachomatis in the fallopian tubes of women without laparoscopic evidence of salpingitis.

Authors:  C Stacey; P Munday; B Thomas; C Gilchrist; D Taylor-Robinson; R Beard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A 2-year quantitative assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic population by the MicroTrak direct smear immunofluorescence test.

Authors:  B J Thomas; M F Osborn; P E Munday; R T Evans; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.359

5.  Sensitivity of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies in smears by use of a fluorescein labelled monoclonal antibody: comparison with conventional chlamydial isolation.

Authors:  B J Thomas; R T Evans; D A Hawkins; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine collected from men and women attending a venereal clinic.

Authors:  M Genç; A Stary; S Bergman; P A Mårdh
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Mucopurulent cervicitis--the ignored counterpart in women of urethritis in men.

Authors:  R C Brunham; J Paavonen; C E Stevens; N Kiviat; C C Kuo; C W Critchlow; K K Holmes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Etiology of cervical inflammation.

Authors:  J Paavonen; C W Critchlow; T DeRouen; C E Stevens; N Kiviat; R C Brunham; W E Stamm; C C Kuo; K E Hyde; L Corey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 8.661

  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Genital chlamydial infection among women in Nicaragua: validity of direct fluorescent antibody testing, prevalence, risk factors and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  B Herrmann; F Espinoza; R R Villegas; G D Smith; A Ramos; M Egger
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1996-02

2.  Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.

Authors:  G L Ridgway; G Mumtaz; A J Robinson; M Franchini; C Carder; J Burczak; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay Abbott IMx Select Chlamydia and the importance of urethral site sampling to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in women.

Authors:  M K Brokenshire; P J Say; A H van Vonno; C Wong
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

4.  Sensitivity of the ligase chain reaction assay for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal swabs from women who are infected at other sites.

Authors:  B J Thomas; T Pierpoint; D Taylor-Robinson; A M Renton
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Provision of diagnostic services for genital chlamydial infection in genitourinary medicine clinics: England and Wales 1996.

Authors:  I Simms; M A Catchpole; A J Robinson; C Laas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

6.  "Does ligase chain reaction assay of urine in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis offer significant improvement over existing diagnostic tests?"--a critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  L Grun; J Sheldon
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1996-12

7.  Lowering the cut off value of an automated chlamydia enzyme immunoassay and confirmation by PCR and direct immunofluorescent antibody test.

Authors:  C Y Tong; C Donnelly; N Hood
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Epidemiology of genital Chlamydia trachomatis in England and Wales.

Authors:  I Simms; M Catchpole; R Brugha; P Rogers; H Mallinson; A Nicoll
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

9.  Chlamydia in women: the more you look, the more you find.

Authors:  P G Fisk; J Shannon; A J Flower
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-12

10.  External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.

Authors:  Sally Land; Sepehr Tabrizi; Anthony Gust; Elizabeth Johnson; Susan Garland; Elizabeth M Dax
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.