Literature DB >> 7666754

Parsing surrounding space into regions.

N Franklin1, L A Henkel, T Zangas.   

Abstract

Surrounding space is not inherently organized, but we tend to treat it as though it consisted of regions (e.g., front, back, right, and left). The current studies show that these conceptual regions have characteristics that reflect our typical interactions with space. Three experiments examined the relative sizes and resolutions of front, back, left, and right around oneself. Front, argued to be the most important horizontal region, was found to be (a) largest, (b) recalled with the greatest precision, and (c) described with the greatest degree pf detao. Our findings suggest that some of the characteristics of the category model proposed by Huttenlocher, Hedges, and Duncan (1991) regarding memory for pictured circular displays may be generalized to space around oneself. More broadly, our results support and extend the spatial framework analysis of representation of surrounding space (Franklin & Tversky, 1990).

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7666754     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Switching points of view in spatial mental models.

Authors:  N Franklin; B Tversky; V Coon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

2.  Structure and strategy in encoding simplified graphs.

Authors:  D J Schiano; B Tversky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-01

3.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Processing locational and orientational information.

Authors:  R H Maki; W S Maki; L G Marsh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-09

5.  Cognitive maps as orienting schemata.

Authors:  M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A comparison of visual tilt illusions measured by the techniques of verticle setting, parallel matching, and dot alignment.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; A Parkinson; D White
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps.

Authors:  R N Shepard; S Hurwitz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

8.  Orientation in cognitive maps.

Authors:  D L Hintzman; C S O'Dell; D R Arndt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Reference points in spatial cognition.

Authors:  E K Sadalla; W J Burroughs; L J Staplin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-09

10.  Immediate memory for spatial location.

Authors:  T O Nelson; S Chaiklin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-09
View more
  14 in total

1.  Functional influences on orienting a reference frame.

Authors:  L A Carlson-Radvansky; Z Tang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

2.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Memory for targets in a multilevel simulated environment: evidence for vertical asymmetry in spatial memory.

Authors:  Paul N Wilson; Nigel Foreman; Danaë Stanton; Hester Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

4.  Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: head, body, and the self-to-array axis.

Authors:  David Waller; Yvonne Lippa; Adam Richardson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20

5.  Swing it to the left, swing it to the right: enacting flexible spatial language using a neurodynamic framework.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Yulia Sandamirskaya; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Memory for locations within regions: spatial biases and visual hemifield differences.

Authors:  B Laeng; M Peters; B McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

7.  Chunking in spatial memory.

Authors:  Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  How the physicality of space affects how we think about time.

Authors:  Jennifer Kolesari; Laura Carlson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-04

9.  Transformations and representations supporting spatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2017-06-01

10.  Two-category place representations persist over body rotations.

Authors:  Hyoun Kyoung Pyoun; Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.