Literature DB >> 29234994

How the physicality of space affects how we think about time.

Jennifer Kolesari1, Laura Carlson2.   

Abstract

Time is an abstract concept that may be better understood when mapped onto space. For English speakers, typically a timeline is used that runs horizontally from left (past) to right (future) (Boroditsky, Fuhrman, & McCormick, 2011) and can be separated into regions, past and future. However, it is unclear from prior research how these regions along the timeline are differentiated. In addition, although for English speakers time is typically thought of in terms of a left-right axis, gestures and metaphors that conceptualize the past as behind and the future as ahead are prevalent, implicating the use of a front-back axis. In three experiments, participants made temporal judgments of pictures while holding their hands in various positions around their bodies, to assess whether the body or hands or both are used as anchors to differentiate regions and whether the front-back axis can be used as a timeline. In Experiment 1 we found independent influences of the body and the hands in anchoring the left-right axis. In Experiment 2 we found support for the use of the front-back axis to map time, with independent influences of the body and the hands in anchoring this axis as well. In Experiment 3 we demonstrated that the timeline must be configured in a way that is consistent with underlying conceptualizations of time, by showing that the above-below axis is not used for English speakers. Together, these results indicate that time is mapped onto space, with this mapping being constrained by underlying conceptualizations of time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Front–back; Left–right; Space; Time

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29234994     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0776-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  23 in total

1.  Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors.

Authors:  L Boroditsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-04-14

2.  Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.

Authors:  L Boroditsky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001).

Authors:  Jenn-Yeu Chen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-10-30

4.  Horizontal spatial representations of time: evidence for the STEARC effect.

Authors:  Masami Ishihara; Peter E Keller; Yves Rossetti; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D.

Authors:  Orly Fuhrman; Kelly McCormick; Eva Chen; Heidi Jiang; Dingfang Shu; Shuaimei Mao; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct

6.  Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference.

Authors:  Ana Torralbo; Julio Santiago; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-08

7.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

8.  Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility.

Authors:  J Brebner; M Shephard; P Cairney
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1972-02

9.  Transformations for within-subject designs: a Monte Carlo investigation.

Authors:  L K Bush; U Hess; G Wolford
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; Thomas Dolk; Annelie Rothe-Wulf; Karl Christoph Klauer; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.