Literature DB >> 1549061

Structure and strategy in encoding simplified graphs.

D J Schiano1, B Tversky.   

Abstract

Tversky and Schiano (1989) found a systematic bias toward the 45 degrees line in memory for the slopes of identical lines when embedded in graphs, but not in maps, suggesting the use of a cognitive reference frame specifically for encoding meaningful graphs. The present experiments explore this issue further using the linear configurations alone as stimuli. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that perception and immediate memory for the slope of a test line within orthogonal "axes" are predictable from purely structural considerations. In Experiments 3 and 4, subjects were instructed to use a diagonal-reference strategy in viewing the stimuli, which were described as "graphs" only in Experiment 3. Results for both studies showed the diagonal bias previously found only for graphs. This pattern provides converging evidence for the diagonal as a cognitive reference frame in encoding linear graphs, and demonstrates that even in highly simplified displays, strategic factors can produce encoding biases not predictable solely from stimulus structure alone.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1549061     DOI: 10.3758/bf03208249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  The role of angles in inducing misalignment in the Poggendorff figure.

Authors:  W H Hotopf; M C Hibberd
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1989-05

2.  Two-dimensional tilt illusions induced by orthogonal plaid patterns: effects of plaid motion, orientation, spatial separation, and spatial frequency.

Authors:  P Wenderoth; S Johnstone; R van der Zwan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Interactions between orientations in human vision.

Authors:  R H Carpenter; C Blakemore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceived orientation of isolated line segments.

Authors:  H Bouma; J J Andriessen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. I: short lines.

Authors:  D P Andrews
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Distortions in judged spatial relations.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Coupe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The roles of axes of symmetry in orientation illusions.

Authors:  A A Hartley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

9.  Mistracking in alignment illusions.

Authors:  W H Hotopf
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude.

Authors:  E C Poulton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  8 in total

1.  The time course of spatial memory distortions.

Authors:  Steffen Werner; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

2.  Strategic and perceptual factors producing tilt contrast in dot localization.

Authors:  D J Bryant; I Subbiah
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11

3.  Parsing surrounding space into regions.

Authors:  N Franklin; L A Henkel; T Zangas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

4.  Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory.

Authors:  Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perception of space by multiple intrinsic frames of reference.

Authors:  Yanlong Sun; Hongbin Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Learning geographical information from hypothetical maps.

Authors:  Nora S Newcombe; Noelle Chiau-Ru Chiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

7.  Testing a dynamic-field account of interactions between spatial attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The Influence of Emotional Framing and Graph Complexity on Biases in Graphical Memory for COVID-19 Data in a Lifespan Sample.

Authors:  Ouxun Jiang; Mary C Whatley; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2022-03-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.