Literature DB >> 23775168

Two-category place representations persist over body rotations.

Hyoun Kyoung Pyoun1, Jesse Sargent, Stephen Dopkins, John Philbeck.   

Abstract

We explored a system that constructs environment-centered frames of reference and coordinates memory for the azimuth of an object in an enclosed space. For one group, we provided two environmental cues (doors): one in the front, and one in the rear. For a second group, we provided two object cues: a front and a rear cue. For a third group, we provided no external cues; we assumed that for this group, their reference frames would be determined by the orthogonal geometry of the floor-and-wall junction that divides a space in half or into multiple territories along the horizontal continuum. Using Huttenlocher, Hedges, and Duncan's (Psychological Review 98: 352-376, 1991) category-adjustment model (cue-based fuzzy boundary version) to fit the data, we observed different reference frames than have been seen in prior studies involving two-dimensional domains. The geometry of the environment affected all three conditions and biased the remembered object locations within a two-category (left vs. right) environmental frame. The influence of the environmental geometry remained observable even after the participants' heading within the environment changed due to a body rotation, attenuating the effect of the front but not of the rear cue. The door and object cues both appeared to define boundaries of spatial categories when they were used for reorientation. This supports the idea that both types of cues can assist in environment-centered memory formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23775168      PMCID: PMC3825563          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0330-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts.

Authors:  David Waller; Daniel R Montello; Anthony E Richardson; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness.

Authors:  Katharina Henke
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  From maps to navigation: the role of cues in finding locations in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Adam T Hutcheson; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

4.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; L V Hedges; S Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Automatic spatial updating during locomotion without vision.

Authors:  M J Farrell; J A Thomson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-08

7.  Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: effects of the number of objects.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang; James A Crowell; Daniel J Simons; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Michael S Ambinder; Laura E Thomas; Jessica L Gosney; Brian R Levinthal; Brendon B Hsieh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

8.  Chunking in spatial memory.

Authors:  Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Human spatial representation: insights from animals.

Authors:  Ranxiao Wang; Elizabeth Spelke
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Parallel information processing in the water maze: evidence for independent memory systems involving dorsal striatum and hippocampus.

Authors:  R J McDonald; N M White
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1994-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.