Literature DB >> 7646664

Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.

P M Lantz1, D Stencil, M T Lippert, S Beversdorf, L Jaros, P L Remington.   

Abstract

A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the combined impact of a physician reminder letter and a telephone contact on the use of Pap tests and mammograms in a low-income managed care program. Women 40 to 79 years of age who were past due for cancer screening were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. Medical claims were reviewed after 6 months to determine intervention effectiveness. The odds of receiving all needed cancer screening tests during follow-up were four times higher in the intervention group. Women who reported having to take time off from work to see a doctor had lower odds of getting screened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7646664      PMCID: PMC1615506          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.6.834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  19 in total

1.  Access to cancer screening services for women.

Authors:  B Kirkman-Liff; J J Kronenfeld
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Feasibility of universal screening mammography. Lessons from a community intervention.

Authors:  M E Costanza; C J D'Orsi; H L Greene; V P Gaw; A Karellas; J G Zapka
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-09

3.  A randomized trial of computerized reminders for blood pressure screening in primary care.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why?

Authors:  L C Harlan; A B Bernstein; L G Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Can computerized reminder systems have an impact on preventive services in practice?

Authors:  P S Frame
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services.

Authors:  S M Ornstein; D R Garr; R G Jenkins; P F Rust; A Arnon
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  A study guided by the Health Belief Model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older.

Authors:  J P Fulton; J S Buechner; H D Scott; B A DeBuono; J P Feldman; R A Smith; D Kovenock
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

Authors:  B K Rimer; M K Keintz; H B Kessler; P F Engstrom; J R Rosan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Daniel A Sussman; Chyke A Doubeni; Daniel S Anderson; Lukejohn Day; Amar R Deshpande; B Joseph Elmunzer; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Jeanette Mendez; Ma Somsouk; James Allison; Taft Bhuket; Zhuo Geng; Beverly B Green; Steven H Itzkowitz; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

3.  A randomized controlled trial of alternative approaches to community follow-up for postpartum women.

Authors:  N C Edwards; N Sims-Jones
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Implementation Science Workshop: Barriers and Facilitators to Increasing Mammography Screening Rates in California's Public Hospitals.

Authors:  Cassidy Clarity; Gato Gourley; Courtney Lyles; Sara Ackerman; Margaret A Handley; Dean Schillinger; Urmimala Sarkar; Joseph Conigliaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Cancer screening practices among primary care physicians serving Chinese Americans in San Francisco.

Authors:  M M Lee; F Lee; S Stewart; S McPhee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-03

6.  Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D S Tseng; E Cox; M B Plane; K M Hla
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Improving rescreening in community clinics: does a system approach work?

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Desi Owens; Jesse Canchola; Farzaneh Tabnak
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-12

8.  Partners and Alerts in Medication Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Judd B Kessler; Andrea B Troxel; David A Asch; Shivan J Mehta; Noora Marcus; Raymond Lim; Jingsan Zhu; William Shrank; Troyen Brennan; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Recruitment of women by GPs for pap tests: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J E Pirkis; D Jolley; D R Dunt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Wisconsin's health department-university partnership model for comprehensive cancer control.

Authors:  Kim Treml; Amy Ellestad Conlon; Mark V Wegner; Mary Baliker; Patrick Remington
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.