Literature DB >> 2817160

Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

J G Zapka1, A M Stoddard, M E Costanza, H L Greene.   

Abstract

The status of mammography screening experience and factors related to utilization were examined in six towns serviced by physician staffs at five hospitals. Data were collected via random digit dial telephone interview of a probability sample of 1184 women, aged 45-75 years. The results showed that 55% of the women reported ever having had a mammogram. Of those who had ever had a mammogram, 21% reported that the mammogram in the past year was their first one. Of those women who are over 50 and had ever had a mammogram, 57% reported one in the past year. Analyses demonstrated that a combination of demographic factors, certain beliefs and knowledge, having a regular physician, social interaction and media exposure are independently related to ever having a mammogram, and to having one in the past year. Despite anecdotal and empirical evidence that the proportion of women ever having had a mammogram has substantially increased in the past several years, increasing utilization among older and lower-income women provides a challenge for public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2817160      PMCID: PMC1349800          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  Increasing the effort toward breast cancer detection.

Authors:  M D Wertheimer; M E Costanza; T F Dodson; C D'Orsi; H Pastides; J G Zapka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential.

Authors:  J Howard
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Barriers and incentives for primary-care physicians in cancer prevention and detection.

Authors:  P A Williams; M Williams
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial.

Authors:  K C Chu; C R Smart; R E Tarone
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-09-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors.

Authors:  D N Rutledge; W H Hartmann; P O Kinman; A C Winfield
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Women who decline breast screening.

Authors:  U Maclean; D Sinfield; S Klein; B Harnden
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  The Health Belief Model: a decade later.

Authors:  N K Janz; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1984
  10 in total
  57 in total

1.  Equity in prevention and health care.

Authors:  V Lorant; B Boland; P Humblet; D Deliège
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Uptake of breast screening is influenced by current religion and religion of upbringing.

Authors:  Dermot O'Reilly; Heather Kinnear; Michael Rosato; Adrian Mairs; Clare Hall
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2013-12

3.  Enthusiasm or uncertainty: small area variations in the use of mammography services in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  V Goel; K Iron; J I Williams
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Older immigrant Tamil women and their doctors: attitudes toward breast cancer screening.

Authors:  M Meana; T Bunston; U George; L Wells; W Rosser
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2001-01

5.  Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.

Authors:  B K Rimer; N Resch; E King; E Ross; C Lerman; A Boyce; H Kessler; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Breast cancer screening practices among users of county-funded health centers vs women in the entire community.

Authors:  D S Lane; A P Polednak; M A Burg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Contributions of public health to patient compliance.

Authors:  B K Rimer; K Glanz; C Lerman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-08

8.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

9.  Benefits of collecting local data on breast cancer and mammography practices in northwestern Pennsylvania.

Authors:  S A Norman; G B Weinberg; B R Krampe; E T Finnegan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Operation with less adjuvant therapy for elderly breast cancer.

Authors:  Akimitsu Yamada; Kazutaka Narui; Sadatoshi Sugae; Daisuke Shimizu; Kazuaki Takabe; Yasushi Ichikawa; Takashi Ishikawa; Itaru Endo
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.