Literature DB >> 2494397

A randomized trial of computerized reminders for blood pressure screening in primary care.

I McDowell1, C Newell, W Rosser.   

Abstract

In a randomized, controlled trial (N = 8,298) the authors compared three ways of encouraging patients in a large family practice to obtain a blood pressure check. Working from computerized medical records at a teaching family-medicine center, the study included patients aged 18 years and over who had not had a blood pressure measurement during the previous year. In a normal-care control group, 21.1% of those due for a blood pressure reading obtained one during the trial year. In one intervention group, a computer-generated message reminded the doctor to check the blood pressure of patients who happened to visit the center for an appointment; 30.7% of patients allocated to this group were checked. In the second group, the nurse contacted patients by telephone and encouraged 24.1% of those who were due for a check to obtain one. Sending a letter to patients in the third group yielded a 35.7% compliance rate. Considering the costs of the three interventions, the physician reminder was the most cost effective, followed by the letter reminder. Although statistically significant, the impact of the reminders was modest. A better approach might involve a combination of routine reminders to the physician, followed by letters to noncompliant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2494397     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  25 in total

Review 1.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Do our patients receive maximum benefit from preventive care? A North American perspective.

Authors:  W W Rosser; H Lamberts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 4.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

Review 5.  Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Thomas R Talbot; David L Sanders; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Clinical research.

Authors:  W W Rosser; M Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.

Authors:  P M Lantz; D Stencil; M T Lippert; S Beversdorf; L Jaros; P L Remington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer in family practice: A review of the literature.

Authors:  D Snadden
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  S Shea; W DuMouchel; L Bahamonde
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gibril J Njie; Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Starr M Banks; David B Callahan; Nicolaas P Pronk; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Thomas E Kottke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.